Heterogeneity of industrial development and evolution of cleaner production: Bibliometric analysis based on JCLP

Cleaner production practices at company level enhance the desire of employees to have a significant positive impact on society through work

“…Furthermore, as discussed earlier, implementation of CPP is also regarded as an efficient preventive approach for abating point source (e.g. garments manufacturing industry in our case) industrial pollution ( Andrews et al., 2002 ; Cong and Shi, 2019 ; Cui et al., 2020 ; de Guimarães et al., 2017 ; Fresner, 1998a ).…”

“…CSR refers to the organizational accomplishments undertaken for the benefit of society ( Farooq and Salam, 2020 , p. 2; Mohamed Adnan et al., 2018 ; Olthuis and van den Oever, 2020 ; Potdar et al., 2020 ; Xiao et al., 2019 ). Similar concept of individual, societal and environmental concern at the core of CPP, makes it much closer to SQ and CSR related environmental initiatives at company level ( Cong and Shi, 2019 ; Farooq and Salam, 2020 ; Ramos et al., 2018 ; Sousa-Zomer et al., 2018 ; Zhang et al., 2015 ).…”

“…Furthermore, we assert that although industrial waste can be minimized by implementing the lean manufacturing principles ( Andrade et al., 2020 ; Chauhan, 2016 ; Manfredsson, 2016 ; Shrafat and Ismail, 2019 ). Yet, the essence of organizational concern towards environment protection is much noteworthy in CPP ( Aranda-Usón et al., 2020 ; Cesar da Silva et al., 2021 ; de Oliveira et al., 2019 ; Ramos et al., 2021 ; Scarazzato et al., 2017 ) which makes former significantly less industrious in terms of our environmental safeguard measures ( Botti et al., 2017 ; Cong and Shi, 2019 ; Psomas and Antony, 2019 ; Salam and Farooq, 2020 ). Moreover, according to Yüksel (2008) CPP is more than a simple implementation of post-production environmental protection regulations ( Cesar da Silva et al., 2021 ; de Oliveira et al., 2019 ; Frydenberg et al., 2004 ; Kennedy, 2020 ; Scarazzato et al., 2017 ).…”

“…employing environment friendly practices and methods during the production process) and post-production (i.e. services) environmental concerns ( Cesar da Silva et al., 2021 ; Cong and Shi, 2019 ; Scarazzato et al., 2017 ; UNEP, 2006 , p. 3; Yin et al., 2021 ). Moreover, implementation of CPP also helps in concentrating on ecofriendly system layout, convention of biodegradable compounds, environmentally concerned production processes and use of recyclable materials throughout whole production process ( Fresner, 1998a ; Hens et al., 2018 ; Ramos et al., 2021 ; Yüksel, 2008 ; Zhao and Zhang, 2020 ).…”

“…However, by enunciating them as predictors of positive workplace behavioral outcomes with regard to employee engagement (EE), organizational pride (OP), organizational identification (OI) and “desire to have a significant impact through work” (DSIW), this study can yield various new insights of interest to policymakers and academicians in the field of CPP, SQ and CSR. As stated earlier, not much is known about the role of the implementation of CPP, SQ and CSR at company level in determining micro level, cognitive, individual behaviors at workplace ( Cong and Shi, 2019 ; Farooq and Salam, 2020 ; Ghosh, 2018 ; Salam and Farooq, 2020 ; Sennewald and Baillie, 2021 ). Therefore, it is important to explore that, how and by what means the implementation of CPP, SQ and CSR is perceived by employees?…”