Heterogeneity of passenger exposure to air pollutants in public transport microenvironments

Abstract

Epidemiologic studies have linked human exposure to pollutants with adverse health effects. Passenger exposure in public transport systems contributes an important fraction of daily burden of air pollutants. While there is extensive literature reporting the concentrations of pollutants in public transport systems in different cities, there are few studies systematically addressing the heterogeneity of passenger exposure in different transit microenvironments, in cabins of different transit vehicles and in areas with different characteristics. The present study investigated PM 2.5 (particulate matter with aerodynamic diameters smaller than 2.5µm), black carbon (BC), ultrafine particles (UFP) and carbon monoxide (CO) pollutant concentrations in various public road transport systems in highly urbanized city of Hong Kong. Using a trolley case housing numerous portable air monitors, we conducted a total of 119 trips during the campaign. Transit microenvironments, classified as 1). busy and secondary roadside bus stops; 2). open and enclosed termini; 3). above-and underground Motor Rail Transport (MTR) platforms, were investigated and compared to identify the factors that may affect passenger exposures. The pollutants inside bus and MTR cabins were also investigated together with a comparison of time integrated exposure between the transit modes. Busy roadside and enclosed termini demonstrated the highest average particle concentrations while the lowest was found on the MTR platforms. Traffic-related pollutants BC, UFP and CO showed larger variations than PM 2.5 across different microenvironments and areas confirming their heterogeneity in urban environments. In-cabin pollutant concentrations showed distinct patterns with BC and UFP high in diesel bus cabins and CO high in LPG bus cabins, suggesting possible self-pollution issues and/or penetration of onroad pollutants inside cabins during bus transit. The total passenger exposure along selected routes, showed bus trips had the potential for higher integrated passenger exposure compared to MTR trips. The present study may provide useful information to better characterize the distribution of passenger exposure pattern in health assessment studies and the results also highlight the need to formulate exposure reduction based air policies in large cities.

Portable, Ambient PM2.5 Sensor for Human and/or Animal Exposure Studies

“…However, travel by car on alternate days produced lower exposure. Peaks in exposure produced during a walk around the city were influenced by pseudorandom factors such as whether the individual passed the vicinity of a high PM emitter.Such behavior has previously been reported in the literature(Lim et al 2015;Yang et al 2015; …”

Urban air quality comparison for bus, tram, subway and pedestrian commutes in Barcelona

“…The effects of polluted urban air on human health are becoming increasingly apparent (e.g. Dominici et al, 2005;Ballester et al, 2008;Colais et al, 2009;HEI 2010;Knibbs et al 2011;Pascal et al, 2013;Nyhan et al, 2014;Yang et al, 2015). Especially vulnerable are individuals already compromised by lung or heart dysfunction, such as asthmatics or citizens with heart rate variability (e.g.…”

Exposure to particulate matter and life loss from traveling by four different common commuting modes

“…Whether a distance-based or duration-based method is used, though, exposure calculations are ultimately dependent on the per-minute ventilation rate (VR), which is defined as the amount of air inhaled per minute [25]. However, since breathing-rate measurement devices seldom, if ever, produce accurate results, most previous studies have chosen default respiration rates based on an activity's predetermined intensity [12,26]. Hardly any studies, however, have monitored the breathing rates of experimental subjects during sampling periods, for different commuter modes.…”