Heterogeneous ice nucleation on atmospheric aerosols: a review of results from laboratory experiments

Hoose, Corinna; Möhler, Ottmar

doi:10.5194/acp-12-9817-2012

Cited by 1,067 publications

(1,304 citation statements)

References 196 publications

(282 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

1,263

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…In contrast, laboratory studies showed that the majority of non-biological substances found in atmospheric ice crystal residues, i.e., natural mineral dust (e.g., Twohy and Poellot, 2005;Pratt et al, 2009;Kamphus et al, 2010), are only ice active at lower temperatures (e.g., Hoose and Möhler, 2012;Murray et al, 2012). One possible explanation for the observed temperature differences might be the presence of biological material (e.g., bacteria) initiating freezing already at temperatures above −10 • C. This biological material may be internally or externally mixed with other substances in atmospheric aerosol particles (Pratt et al, 2009).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 96%

Immersion freezing of ice nucleation active protein complexes

et al. 2013

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Utilising the Leipzig Aerosol Cloud Interaction Simulator (LACIS), the immersion freezing behaviour of droplet ensembles containing monodisperse particles, generated from a Snomax™ solution/suspension, was investigated. Thereto ice fractions were measured in the temperature range between −5 °C to −38 °C. Snomax™ is an industrial product applied for artificial snow production and contains Pseudomonas syringae} bacteria which have long been used as model organism for atmospheric relevant ice nucleation active (INA) bacteria. The ice nucleation activity of such bacteria is controlled by INA protein complexes in their outer membrane.

In our experiments, ice fractions increased steeply in the temperature range from about −6 °C to about −10 °C and then levelled off at ice fractions smaller than one. The plateau implies that not all examined droplets contained an INA protein complex. Assuming the INA protein complexes to be Poisson distributed over the investigated droplet populations, we developed the CHESS model (stoCHastic modEl of similar and poiSSon distributed ice nuclei) which allows for the calculation of ice fractions as function of temperature and time for a given nucleation rate. Matching calculated and measured ice fractions, we determined and parameterised the nucleation rate of INA protein complexes exhibiting class III ice nucleation behaviour. Utilising the CHESS model, together with the determined nucleation rate, we compared predictions from the model to experimental data from the literature and found good agreement.

We found that (a) the heterogeneous ice nucleation rate expression quantifying the ice nucleation behaviour of the INA protein complex is capable of describing the ice nucleation behaviour observed in various experiments for both, Snomax™ and P. syringae bacteria, (b) the ice nucleation rate, and its temperature dependence, seem to be very similar regardless of whether the INA protein complexes inducing ice nucleation are attached to the outer membrane of intact bacteria or membrane fragments, (c) the temperature range in which heterogeneous droplet freezing occurs, and the fraction of droplets being able to freeze, both depend on the actual number of INA protein complexes present in the droplet ensemble, and (d) possible artifacts suspected to occur in connection with the drop freezing method, i.e., the method frequently used by biologist for quantifying ice nucleation behaviour, are of minor importance, at least for substances such as P. syringae, which induce freezing at comparably high temperatures. The last statement implies that for single ice nucleation entities such as INA protein complexes, it is the number of entities present in the droplet population, and the entities' nucleation rate, which control the freezing behaviour of the droplet population. Quantities such as ice active surface site density are not suitable in this context.

The results obtained in this study allow a different perspective on the quantification of the immersi...

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 96%

Immersion freezing of ice nucleation active protein complexes

et al. 2013

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…3). Nominally, only one in a million particles can act as an INP at -20°C (39)(40)(41)(42)(43)(44)(45). If the temperature is reduced sufficiently, then all CCN can potentially act as sites for ice to form on by homogeneous freezing.…”

Section: Ice and Mixed-phase Cloudsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Improving our fundamental understanding of the role of aerosol−cloud interactions in the climate system

Seinfeld

Bretherton

Carslaw

et al. 2016

Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.

611

474

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The effect of an increase in atmospheric aerosol concentrations on the distribution and radiative properties of Earth's clouds is the most uncertain component of the overall global radiative forcing from preindustrial time. General circulation models (GCMs) are the tool for predicting future climate, but the treatment of aerosols, clouds, and aerosol−cloud radiative effects carries large uncertainties that directly affect GCM predictions, such as climate sensitivity. Predictions are hampered by the large range of scales of interaction between various components that need to be captured. Observation systems (remote sensing, in situ) are increasingly being used to constrain predictions, but significant challenges exist, to some extent because of the large range of scales and the fact that the various measuring systems tend to address different scales. Fine-scale models represent clouds, aerosols, and aerosol−cloud interactions with high fidelity but do not include interactions with the larger scale and are therefore limited from a climatic point of view. We suggest strategies for improving estimates of aerosol−cloud relationships in climate models, for new remote sensing and in situ measurements, and for quantifying and reducing model uncertainty.climate | aerosol−cloud effects | general circulation models | radiative forcing | satellite observations Clouds play a key role in Earth's radiation budget, and aerosols serve as the seeds upon which cloud droplets form. Anthropogenic activity has led to an increase in aerosol particle concentrations globally and an increase in those particles that act as cloud condensation nuclei (CCN) and ice nucleating particles (INP). The effect of an increase in aerosols on cloud optical properties, and associated radiative forcing, is the most uncertain component of historical radiative forcing of Earth's climate caused by greenhouse gases (GHGs) and aerosols. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) AR5 assessment of climate forcing factors (Fig. S1) ascribes "high" confidence to the estimate of direct aerosol radiative forcing (mean

show abstract

“…Recent interest on atmospheric distributions of PBAP is motivated by their potentially important role in cloud ice formation and precipitation development (e.g., [44]). Number concentrations of biological particles were found to decrease by about two orders of magnitude from near-surface to the free troposphere [45].…”

Section: Primary Biological Aerosol Particlesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Climate Feedback on Aerosol Emission and Atmospheric Concentrations

Tegen

Schepanski

2018

Curr Clim Change Rep

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose of Review Climate factors may considerably impact on natural aerosol emissions and atmospheric distributions. The interdependencies of processes within the aerosol-climate system may thus cause climate feedbacks that need to be understood. Recent findings on various major climate impacts on aerosol distributions are summarized in this review. Recent Findings While generally atmospheric aerosol distributions are influenced by changes in precipitation, atmospheric mixing, and ventilation due to circulation changes, emissions from natural aerosol sources strongly depend on climate factors like wind speed, temperature, and vegetation. Aerosol sources affected by climate are desert sources of mineral dust, marine aerosol sources, and vegetation sources of biomass burning aerosol and biogenic volatile organic gases that are precursors for secondary aerosol formation. Different climate impacts on aerosol distributions may offset each other. Summary In regions where anthropogenic aerosol loads decrease, the impacts of climate on natural aerosol variabilities will increase. Detailed knowledge of processes controlling aerosol concentrations is required for credible future projections of aerosol distributions.

show abstract

Heterogeneous ice nucleation on atmospheric aerosols: a review of results from laboratory experiments

Cited by 1,067 publications

References 196 publications

Immersion freezing of ice nucleation active protein complexes

Immersion freezing of ice nucleation active protein complexes

Improving our fundamental understanding of the role of aerosol−cloud interactions in the climate system

Climate Feedback on Aerosol Emission and Atmospheric Concentrations

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About