“…However, Cr(III) is an essential trace element for human health with no toxicity. , Up to now, many techniques including membrane filtration, ion change, adsorption, and reduction of Cr(VI) to Cr(III) have been developed to remove Cr(VI) from industrial wastewater. − Among these techniques, the reduction of Cr(VI) to Cr(III) is well recognized as the best strategy due to its advantages of being most compatible and cost-effective . In contrast to traditional reduction techniques such as microreduction, chemical reduction, and electrochemical reduction, the photocatalytic reduction of Cr(VI) to Cr(III) has the advantages of high efficiency, low cost, and being free of any hazardous chemical formation. , Metal–organic frameworks (MOFs), as the emerging photocatalysts, were widely utilized to efficiently reduce Cr(VI) into Cr(III) due to their features of desirable topologies, crystallinity, porous structure, high surface areas, and pore volume. − For example, UiO-66-NH 2 and its derivatives exhibit outstanding performance for photocatalytic Cr(VI) reduction . Though metal–organic frameworks (MOFs) have many merits, they still suffer from the high recombination rate of the photoinduced electrons and holes and limited light absorption .…”