2007
DOI: 10.1111/j.1439-0531.2007.00893.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Heterologous In Vitro Fertility Evaluation of Cryopreserved Iberian Red Deer Epididymal Spermatozoa with Zona‐intact Sheep Oocytes and its Relationship with the Characteristics of Thawed Spermatozoa

Abstract: A heterologous in vitro system, using zona-intact sheep oocytes, was used to evaluate the relationship between sperm factors of Iberian red deer thawed epididymal sperm and the percentage of cleaved oocytes. Epididymal spermatozoa were recovered from six males, diluted with freezing extender and cryopreserved. After thawing sperm motility (SM) and acrosome and membrane integrities were evaluated. Again, these parameters were assessed after incubation in freezing extender at 37 degrees C for 2 h. After cryopres… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The egg ZP apparently represents a significant barrier to many, if not most, heterospecific crosses in vitro [56]. However, cat oocytes were fertilized by tiger spermatozoa [57]; bovine oocytes were fertilized by goat, ram, and antelope spermatozoa [58][59][60]); and sheep oocytes were fertilized by deer spermatozoa [61]. When comparing heterologous IVF between species, the success of sperm penetration through the ZP is highly variable.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The egg ZP apparently represents a significant barrier to many, if not most, heterospecific crosses in vitro [56]. However, cat oocytes were fertilized by tiger spermatozoa [57]; bovine oocytes were fertilized by goat, ram, and antelope spermatozoa [58][59][60]); and sheep oocytes were fertilized by deer spermatozoa [61]. When comparing heterologous IVF between species, the success of sperm penetration through the ZP is highly variable.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Previous 475 studies have described cross species fertilization of zona intact oocytes between phylogenetically related species, such as domestic and endangered felids [4,[41][42][43], or between bovine and equine [44], as well as between bovine and artiodactyls [5][6][7][8]45]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the specificity of the zona pellucida, heterologous IVF application is generally limited to phylogenetically closely related species. Heterologous IVF has been successful when co-incubating oocytes and 55 spermatozoa from cat and tiger spermatozoa [4], bovine and goat, ram or antelope [5][6][7] and sheep and deer respectively [8]. Sometimes, it has been necessary to remove the ZP to achieve heterologous IVF as in the case of dolphin spermatozoa and hamster oocytes [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, sperm ‘freezability’ (comparison of the pre‐freezing and post‐thawing quality) might not suffice when characterizing samples from a male in the laboratory, being necessary to test the real resistance of spermatozoa by challenging them in physiological and non‐physiological conditions (Roth et al. 1999; Soler et al. 2008).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This example not only shows the impact of between-male differences, but also that the initial quality of a sample (just after thawing, in this case) might be not informative of its real potentiality. Therefore, sperm 'freezability' (comparison of the pre-freezing and post-thawing quality) might not suffice when characterizing samples from a male in the laboratory, being necessary to test the real resistance of spermatozoa by challenging them in physiological and non-physiological conditions (Roth et al 1999;Soler et al 2008). Furthermore, molecular techniques may be used to predict the performance of spermatozoa beyond cryopreservation (Thurston et al 2002;Grunewald et al 2008).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%