2020
DOI: 10.20546/ijcmas.2020.903.074
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Heterosis for Earliness and Heat Tolerant Trait in Bread Wheat [Triticum aestivum (L.)] over the Environments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Four crosses L1 × T3, L2 × T2, L4 × T1 and L5 × T2 for traits weight of grains/spike and 1000 grains weight in addition two crosses L1 × T2 and L3 × T2 of weight of grains/spike showed significant positive (P≤0.05 or 0.01) Sij effects, they considered a good donor for these traits. These results are in line with those reported by Sarwar (2016), Ijaz & Kaukab (2017), Rajput (2018), Ranjitha et al (2018), Shah et al (2018a), El-Gammaal (2019), Alhossary (2020), Dhoot et al (2020), Gupta et al (2020), Kizilgeci (2020), El Nahas & Ali (2021 and Roy et al (2021b). Gemmeiza 11 (L1), Sids 1 (L2), Sids 14 (L3), Misr 1 (L4), Misr 2 (L5), Sids 12 (T1), Sakha 94 (T2) and Giza 171 (T3), *,** significant at 0.05 and 0.01 levels of probability, respectively.…”
Section: Combining Ability Effects and Variancessupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Four crosses L1 × T3, L2 × T2, L4 × T1 and L5 × T2 for traits weight of grains/spike and 1000 grains weight in addition two crosses L1 × T2 and L3 × T2 of weight of grains/spike showed significant positive (P≤0.05 or 0.01) Sij effects, they considered a good donor for these traits. These results are in line with those reported by Sarwar (2016), Ijaz & Kaukab (2017), Rajput (2018), Ranjitha et al (2018), Shah et al (2018a), El-Gammaal (2019), Alhossary (2020), Dhoot et al (2020), Gupta et al (2020), Kizilgeci (2020), El Nahas & Ali (2021 and Roy et al (2021b). Gemmeiza 11 (L1), Sids 1 (L2), Sids 14 (L3), Misr 1 (L4), Misr 2 (L5), Sids 12 (T1), Sakha 94 (T2) and Giza 171 (T3), *,** significant at 0.05 and 0.01 levels of probability, respectively.…”
Section: Combining Ability Effects and Variancessupporting
confidence: 92%
“…These results revealed that selection plants for these traits should be postponed to the later generations because of predominance of non-additive gene action for all studied traits. These consequences are in arrangement with those of Fellahi et al (2013), Abd El-Aty et al (2016), Ali (2019), El-Gammaal (2019, Dhoot et al (2020), Roy et al (2021b) and Chaudhary et al (2022).…”
Section: Genetic Componentsmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…Similar findings were reported by Desale and Mehta [10], Barot et al, [11], Kalhoro et al, [2], Thomas et al, [12], Patel [13], Kumar et al [14], Dhoot et al, [15], Joshi and Kumar [16] and Singh et al, [17] for above traits in wheat.…”
Section: Total Chlorophyll Contentsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Four crosses L2 × T2, L4 × T1, L5 × T3 and L7 × T3 for 1000 grains weight showed significant positive (P≤0.05 or 0.01) SCA effects, they considered a good donor for these traits. These results are in line with those reported by El-Gammaal et al[6], Ijaz et al[10], Rajput et al[11], Alhossary et al[12], Gupta et al[13], Ranjitha et al[15], Dhoot et al[16] and El Nahas et al[17], Isah et al[18], Ebana et al[19], Guzmán et al[20].…”
supporting
confidence: 89%