2007
DOI: 10.1007/s10592-007-9309-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Heterozygosity-fitness correlations within inbreeding classes: local or genome-wide effects?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

5
63
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
5
63
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results of our molecular metrics analyses were derived from a panel of 19 microsatellite loci, which is larger than those used in many other studies of endangered or wild species (e.g., Coulson et al 1999). Nevertheless, our findings were consistent with recent studies suggesting that the correlation between marker-based heterozygosity and inbreeding levels may often be too weak to be of biological significance (Coltman and Slate 2003;Hansson and Westerberg 2008). However, we are not prepared to take this latter position because, to-date, most of our pedigrees were only two generations deep.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The results of our molecular metrics analyses were derived from a panel of 19 microsatellite loci, which is larger than those used in many other studies of endangered or wild species (e.g., Coulson et al 1999). Nevertheless, our findings were consistent with recent studies suggesting that the correlation between marker-based heterozygosity and inbreeding levels may often be too weak to be of biological significance (Coltman and Slate 2003;Hansson and Westerberg 2008). However, we are not prepared to take this latter position because, to-date, most of our pedigrees were only two generations deep.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…The most frequently used molecular metrics of heterozygosity in HFCs analyses include standardized multilocus heterozygosity (stMLH; Coltman et al 1999), internal relatedness (IR; Amos et al 2001) and standardized mean d 2 (Coulson et al 1998). However, it has been suggested that the correlation between molecular heterozygosity and pedigree inbreeding coefficients is too weak to be of biological significance (Coltman and Slate 2003;Balloux et al 2004;Slate et al 2004;Hansson and Westerberg 2008). For wild canids, results vary even between studies of the same species.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As fullsiblings share their ancestry and inbreeding history, HFCs within full-sibling are commonly interpreted as evidence for local effects (Hansson et al 2001;Da Silva et al 2006;Fossøy et al 2009). However, it has recently been put forward that the existence of HFCs among full-siblings should be interpreted with care, as full-siblings will vary in the proportion of the genome, which is identical by descent due to chance events during Mendelian segregation (Forstmeier et al 2012; but see Hansson and Westerberg 2008). This variation may already be sufficient to cause HFCs even among full-siblings.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We addressed whether genetic variability may be mediating mortality by examining relationships between genetic variability and survival from exposure to CDV and FPV. Under an assumption that levels of neutral genetic variation are surrogates for measures of adaptive genetic variation owing to a subset of the target loci being linked to functional loci [25,26], we tested (i) whether genetic variability differed between animals that have not been exposed to CDV or FPV and those that have successfully seroconverted (i.e. survived infection), and (ii) whether these associations were best observed in the context of general heterozygosity, the extent of inbreeding, or the extent of outbreeding.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%