2015 Picture Coding Symposium (PCS) 2015
DOI: 10.1109/pcs.2015.7170039
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

HEVC coding optimisation for Ultra High Definition television services

Abstract: Ultra High Definition TV (UHDTV) services are being trialled while UHD streaming services have already seen commercial débuts. The amount of data associated with these new services is very high thus extremely efficient video compression tools are required for delivery to the end user. The recently published High Efficiency Video Coding (HEVC) standard promises a new level of compression efficiency, up to 50% better than its predecessor, Advanced Video Coding (AVC). The greater efficiency in HEVC is obtained at… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For this reason, during the development of the Turing codec, great importance was given towards evaluating the impact of HEVC tools on compression efficiency and complexity, with the goal of defining a set of requirements (in terms of parameters and tools) to guide the development of the encoder. Many experiments were performed for this purpose, as detailed in (8). In particular the HM reference software was used (Version 12.0) to encode 16 UHD sequences (spatial resolution of 3840 × 2160 luma samples), frame rate of 50 or 60 Hz, 4:2:0 format, 8 bits per component, according to the Common Test Conditions (CTCs) (9) used by the JCT-VC under the Random Access Main (RA-Main) configuration.…”
Section: Encoding Process Optimisations and Speed Presetsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this reason, during the development of the Turing codec, great importance was given towards evaluating the impact of HEVC tools on compression efficiency and complexity, with the goal of defining a set of requirements (in terms of parameters and tools) to guide the development of the encoder. Many experiments were performed for this purpose, as detailed in (8). In particular the HM reference software was used (Version 12.0) to encode 16 UHD sequences (spatial resolution of 3840 × 2160 luma samples), frame rate of 50 or 60 Hz, 4:2:0 format, 8 bits per component, according to the Common Test Conditions (CTCs) (9) used by the JCT-VC under the Random Access Main (RA-Main) configuration.…”
Section: Encoding Process Optimisations and Speed Presetsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The test set used in this paper comprises 16 sequences with 8 bits per component, 4:2:0 chroma format, 3840 × 2160 spatial resolution, and frame rate of 50 and 60 fps. More information on the test sequences can be found elsewhere [16]. Each sequence is encoded with four QP values which were determined by visually inspecting the test set compressed with QP ranging from 22 to 45.…”
Section: A Test Materials and Coding Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lower value corresponds to higher rate accuracy. Experimental analysis presented in this paper was performed using a fast HEVC encoder implementation based on HM version 12.0 [5], denoted as HM-fast, which was tailored for fast encoding of UHD content [16]. All the results presented here use the HM-fast codec run in VBR mode as anchor.…”
Section: A Test Materials and Coding Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the DST is used only for the smallest block size, namely 4 × 4 pixels, the DCT is used for all the other sizes, up to 32 × 32. For this reason, some works pointed out that the complexity of the transform stage in the HEVC context is particularly relevant [2,3]. This motivated several researchers to propose dedicated architectures for variable size DCTs, such as [4][5][6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%