HEVC/H.265 vs. VP9 state-of-the-art video coding comparison for HD and UHD applications

Deep, Vishal; Elarabi, Tarek

doi:10.1109/ccece.2017.7946796

Cited by 8 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 7 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Hal ini terjadi karena adanya evolusi atau perkembangan standar video dalam teori harus sejalan dan dapat diterapkan dalam teknologi tertentu. Terutama perusahaan penyiaran digital sudah mulai menyajikan konten UHD di saluran TV digital (Deep & Elarabi, 2017).…”

Section: Pendahuluanunclassified

Analisis Perbandingan Teknik Video Codec H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC, VP9 dan AV1

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Video applications consume more energy on the Internet and can be accessed by electronic devices, due to an increase in the consumption of high-resolution and high-quality video content, presenting serious issues to delivery infrastructure that needs higher video compression technologies. The focus of this paper is to evaluate the quality of the most current codec, AV1, to its predecessor codec. The comparison was made experimentally at two video resolutions (1080p and 720p) by sampling video frames with various CRF/CQP values and testing several parameters analyses such as encoding duration, compression ratio, bit rate, Mean Square Error (MSE), and Peak Signal to Noise Ratio (PSNR). The AV1 codec is very great in terms of quality and file size, even though it is slower in terms of compression speed. The H.265/HEVC codec, on the other side, beats the other codec in terms of compression ratio. In conclusion, the H.265/HEVC codec is suggested as a material for obtaining a well compressed video with small file size and a short time.

show abstract

Section: Pendahuluanunclassified

Analisis Perbandingan Teknik Video Codec H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC, VP9 dan AV1

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Kufa et al [ 54 ] explored coding efficiency performance of High Efficiency Video Coding (HEVC) and VP9 compression formats on video content in Full HD and UHD resolutions. Deep et al [ 55 ] focused on the comparison of HEVC and VP9 based on both subjective and objective evaluation on various (720p, 1080p, and 2160p) test videos. Akyazi et al [ 56 ] examined the compression efficiency of HEVC/H.265, VP9, and AV1 codecs based on subjective quality assessment.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Impact of Scene Content on High Resolution Video Quality

Uhrina

Holesova

Bienik

et al. 2021

Sensors

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper deals with the impact of content on the perceived video quality evaluated using the subjective Absolute Category Rating (ACR) method. The assessment was conducted on eight types of video sequences with diverse content obtained from the SJTU dataset. The sequences were encoded at 5 different constant bitrates in two widely video compression standards H.264/AVC and H.265/HEVC at Full HD and Ultra HD resolutions, which means 160 annotated video sequences were created. The length of Group of Pictures (GOP) was set to half the framerate value, as is typical for video intended for transmission over a noisy communication channel. The evaluation was performed in two laboratories: one situated at the University of Zilina, and the second at the VSB—Technical University in Ostrava. The results acquired in both laboratories reached/showed a high correlation. Notwithstanding the fact that the sequences with low Spatial Information (SI) and Temporal Information (TI) values reached better Mean Opinion Score (MOS) score than the sequences with higher SI and TI values, these two parameters are not sufficient for scene description, and this domain should be the subject of further research. The evaluation results led us to the conclusion that it is unnecessary to use the H.265/HEVC codec for compression of Full HD sequences and the compression efficiency of the H.265 codec by the Ultra HD resolution reaches the compression efficiency of both codecs by the Full HD resolution. This paper also includes the recommendations for minimum bitrate thresholds at which the video sequences at both resolutions retain good and fair subjectively perceived quality.

show abstract

“…This is because the evolution or development of video standards, in theory, should align and can be implemented in a certain technology. Moreover, digital broadcasting companies have started to present UHD content on digital TV channels [4]. This triggers an increasing need for video compression.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Objective Quality Assessment of Multi-Resolution Video based on H.264/AVC and H.265/HEVC Encoding

Rizal¹,

Suharso²,

Abujabbar³

et al. 2020

Proceedings of the Proceedings of the 7th Mathematics, Science, and Computer Science Education International Seminar, MSCEIS 20

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study aims to carry out an objective assessment by evaluating the encoding performance of the new standard compared to its predecessor H.264/AVC. In addition, to produce a comprehensive investigation, we compared several resolutions (1080p, 720p, and 480p) with a combination of CRF and encoder presets. To find out the performance of both techniques we used several test parameters such as encoding duration, compression ratio, bitrate, MSE, and PSNR. The results showed that H.264 was faster in terms of the time needed to carry out the encoding process. However the compression ratio and bitrate of H.265 was better with a difference of 38.5% and 52.7% respectively. Finally, if the user wants to prioritize better quality video output without having to sacrifice a lot of compression time and small file size, then our recommendation is to use H.265 and by HD resolution configuration (720p) with medium presets and 18 CRF value.

show abstract

HEVC/H.265 vs. VP9 state-of-the-art video coding comparison for HD and UHD applications

Cited by 8 publications

References 7 publications

Analisis Perbandingan Teknik Video Codec H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC, VP9 dan AV1

Analisis Perbandingan Teknik Video Codec H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC, VP9 dan AV1

Impact of Scene Content on High Resolution Video Quality

Objective Quality Assessment of Multi-Resolution Video based on H.264/AVC and H.265/HEVC Encoding

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About