2000
DOI: 10.1159/000024435
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hexamethylene Diisocyanate Causes Contraction of Canine Tracheal Smooth Muscles through Activation of Muscarinic Receptors

Abstract: Background: Asthma caused by occupational exposure to hexamethylene diisocyanate (HDI) is well known; however, the exact pathogenic mechanisms remain unclear. Methods: Experiments were performed using a standard canine tracheal smooth muscle (CTSM) strip preparation in an isolated bath to determine the effect of HDI on tracheal smooth muscle contraction. HDI concentration-response curves were constructed and the effects of different receptor antagonists on HDI-induced smooth muscle contraction were determined.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 23 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Eleven agents, 10 –5 M pyrilamine (an antihistamine H 1 receptor blocking agent; Sigma, St. Louis, Mo., USA), 10 –6 M pranlukast (a cysteinyl leukotriene receptor antagonist; Ono Pharmaceutical, Osaka, Japan), 10 –6 M seratrodast (a thromboxane A 2 synthetase inhibitor; Takeda Chemical Industries, Osaka), 10 –6 M atropine (an anti-cholinergic drug; Sigma), 10 –8 M neostigmine (an anticholinesterase; Sigma), 10 –5 M verapamil (a calcium channel blocking agent; Wako Chemicals, Osaka), 10 –6 M phentolamine (an α-adrenergic blocking agent; Sigma), 10 –6 M prazosin (an α-adrenergic blocking agent; Sigma), 10 –6 M propranolol (a β-adrenergic blocking agent, Sigma), 10 –6 M isoproterenol (a β 2 -adrenergic receptor stimulant; Wako Chemicals) and 10 –6 M cimetidine (a H 2 receptor blocking agent; Wako Chemicals) were tested. The concentration of each agent selected in these experiments was based on our previous studies [7, 8]. Each agent was dissolved in Krebs-Henseleit solution, and this process was not associated with any change in the acid-base balance of the buffer.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Eleven agents, 10 –5 M pyrilamine (an antihistamine H 1 receptor blocking agent; Sigma, St. Louis, Mo., USA), 10 –6 M pranlukast (a cysteinyl leukotriene receptor antagonist; Ono Pharmaceutical, Osaka, Japan), 10 –6 M seratrodast (a thromboxane A 2 synthetase inhibitor; Takeda Chemical Industries, Osaka), 10 –6 M atropine (an anti-cholinergic drug; Sigma), 10 –8 M neostigmine (an anticholinesterase; Sigma), 10 –5 M verapamil (a calcium channel blocking agent; Wako Chemicals, Osaka), 10 –6 M phentolamine (an α-adrenergic blocking agent; Sigma), 10 –6 M prazosin (an α-adrenergic blocking agent; Sigma), 10 –6 M propranolol (a β-adrenergic blocking agent, Sigma), 10 –6 M isoproterenol (a β 2 -adrenergic receptor stimulant; Wako Chemicals) and 10 –6 M cimetidine (a H 2 receptor blocking agent; Wako Chemicals) were tested. The concentration of each agent selected in these experiments was based on our previous studies [7, 8]. Each agent was dissolved in Krebs-Henseleit solution, and this process was not associated with any change in the acid-base balance of the buffer.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%