2003
DOI: 10.1126/science.1078607
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hexapod Origins: Monophyletic or Paraphyletic?

Abstract: Recent morphological and molecular evidence has changed interpretations of arthropod phylogeny and evolution. Here we compare complete mitochondrial genomes to show that Collembola, a wingless group traditionally considered as basal to all insects, appears instead to constitute a separate evolutionary lineage that branched much earlier than the separation of many crustaceans and insects and independently adapted to life on land. Therefore, the taxon Hexapoda, as commonly defined to include all six-legged arthr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

10
227
7
8

Year Published

2004
2004
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 346 publications
(252 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
10
227
7
8
Order By: Relevance
“…The support for the monophyly of Crustacea plus Hexapoda, which came most emphatically from the evidence of a shared mitochondrial genome rearrangement, has been bolstered by numerous subsequent molecular phylogenetic analyses (Friedrich & Tautz 1995;Hwang et al 2001;Delsuc et al 2003;Nardi et al 2003;Regier et al 2005). Consideration of various aspects of morphology, in particular of nervous system ontogeny and structure, gives further weight to the integrity of this clade.…”
Section: The Position Of the Hexapoda Within The Pancrustaceamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The support for the monophyly of Crustacea plus Hexapoda, which came most emphatically from the evidence of a shared mitochondrial genome rearrangement, has been bolstered by numerous subsequent molecular phylogenetic analyses (Friedrich & Tautz 1995;Hwang et al 2001;Delsuc et al 2003;Nardi et al 2003;Regier et al 2005). Consideration of various aspects of morphology, in particular of nervous system ontogeny and structure, gives further weight to the integrity of this clade.…”
Section: The Position Of the Hexapoda Within The Pancrustaceamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While rRNA and nuclear coding gene phylogenies recover the expected monophyly of the hexapods (Insecta, Diplura, Protura and Collembola), analyses using complete mitochondrial genomes recover a diphyletic Hexapoda with the Insecta separated from the Collembola ( Nardi et al 2003); sequences for Diplura and Protura were not available. The basis of this result has been questioned by subsequent authors Figure 3.…”
Section: The Position Of the Hexapoda Within The Pancrustaceamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This rate has several shortcomings: (1) it was estimated from eight arthropod examples only; (2) comparisons were only made at the intraspecific level or between closely related species; (3) the sequences used were short, representing only a small fraction of the mitochondrial genome (partial cox1, cox2, rrnS and rrnL sequences) and (4) genetic distances were calculated from restriction site polymorphisms, DNA-levels. The analysis of full mitochondrial genomes has been established as a powerful approach to elucidate deeper-level relationships among vertebrates (e.g., Zardoya and Meyer, 1996;Meyer and Zardoya, 2003;Murata et al, 2003) and also among Arthropods (e.g., Nardi et al, 2003;Masta et al, 2009). Recent studies have explored the utility of applying mitochondrial genome data to resolve phylogenetic relationships at the intraordinal level of insects with promising results, as for the Diptera (Cameron et al, 2007), Orthoptera (Fenn et al, 2008) and Hymenoptera (Dowton et al, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mitochondrial genome analyses, both on gene order and nucleotide analyses of the brachiopod Terebratulina retusa convincingly support a protostome relationship with an affiliation to the spiral cleaving molluscs and annelids (Stechmann and Schlegel, 1999). However, some results on the analysis of mitochondrial genome comparisons challenge classical evidence, such as the monophyly of insects (Nardi et al, 2003).…”
Section: Metazoan Phylogeny From Mitochondrial Genomesmentioning
confidence: 48%