2002
DOI: 10.1680/haoupsaud.31012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hidden aspects of urban planning: surface and underground development

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They also require geological data to ensure that sterilisation of resources or contaminative activities close to vulnerable aquifers do not occur. With these views firmly in mind, several authors such as: Brook & Marker (1987), Marker (1998), Bell & Culshaw (1998), Smith & Ellison (1999), Howland (2000), and Paul et al (2002) have suggested what types of geoscientific data planners and developers require: To find out why geoscientific information is not being fully used and applied, the views of around 20 stakeholders within the Thames Gateway region were sought from a variety of professions, including local and regional government, utility industries, government agencies, geotechnical and engineering companies and local development agencies and corporations. This information was combined with information from previous studies, such as: Nickless (1982), De Mulder (1988), Thompson et al (1998), Ellison et al (1998), Marker (1998) and Culshaw & Ellison (2002).…”
Section: Requirements For Digital Geoscientific Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…They also require geological data to ensure that sterilisation of resources or contaminative activities close to vulnerable aquifers do not occur. With these views firmly in mind, several authors such as: Brook & Marker (1987), Marker (1998), Bell & Culshaw (1998), Smith & Ellison (1999), Howland (2000), and Paul et al (2002) have suggested what types of geoscientific data planners and developers require: To find out why geoscientific information is not being fully used and applied, the views of around 20 stakeholders within the Thames Gateway region were sought from a variety of professions, including local and regional government, utility industries, government agencies, geotechnical and engineering companies and local development agencies and corporations. This information was combined with information from previous studies, such as: Nickless (1982), De Mulder (1988), Thompson et al (1998), Ellison et al (1998), Marker (1998) and Culshaw & Ellison (2002).…”
Section: Requirements For Digital Geoscientific Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This requires planners to consider the social, economic and political needs of their area as well as the needs of the environment. Geological and geotechnical issues tend to appear well down the list of priorities (Paul et al 2002). All too often it is only after problems have occurred that attention is turned towards geological and geotechnical issues.…”
Section: Requirements For Digital Geoscientific Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…and Paul et al, (2002) report that countries including Hong Kong, Singapore, the Netherlands, Canada and Denmark, have adopted underground space for uses including hydrocarbon storage, wastewater treatment, car parking and retail. The drivers for using underground space include limited above ground space, geomorphological controls (e.g.…”
Section: Underground Spacementioning
confidence: 99%
“…An accurate estimation of underground mineral resources helps to project future exploitation according to technological level and human demand. The same principle is applied in urban subsurface development (Paul, Chow et al 2002), which requires a comprehensive knowledge basis for understanding the truth of natural assets beneath the cities.…”
Section: Building Information Platform As the First Step For An Integmentioning
confidence: 99%