1993
DOI: 10.2307/2290750
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

6
1,255
0
58

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 896 publications
(1,319 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
6
1,255
0
58
Order By: Relevance
“…Currently, regression analyses are the accepted means of analyzing correspondence between two reporters, with individual difference factors included as moderating variables (Goldstein, Bryk, & Raudenbush, 1993). This method enables researchers to examine the correlation between raters’ assessments and then to examine how individual difference factors moderate that correlation.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, regression analyses are the accepted means of analyzing correspondence between two reporters, with individual difference factors included as moderating variables (Goldstein, Bryk, & Raudenbush, 1993). This method enables researchers to examine the correlation between raters’ assessments and then to examine how individual difference factors moderate that correlation.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach is a more stable and efficient technique for estimation and findings are more easily interpretable. Residual variation can be partitioned into both within‐ and between‐group variation and the “added value” of examining interactions between aspects of status can be evaluated beyond simply main effect contributions (Goldstein et al, 1993; Green et al, 2017). Attending to heterogeneity both within and between social categories also adds specificity and detail on validity (Wemrell et al, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MLM techniques were implemented with HLM 7 software (Bryk & Raudenbush, 1987; Goldstein et al, 2006) using restricted maximum likelihood estimation such that repeated daily measures were nested within participants. Given that the outcome variable was binomial (1 = consumed alcohol that day , 0 = did not consume alcohol ), a Bernoulli distribution was used.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%