2003
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-45209-6_166
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hierarchical Peer-to-Peer Systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
78
0
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 90 publications
(80 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
78
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This issue is also addressed by an alternative approach, in which the multilevel structure is achieved based on the existence of superpeers i.e., nodes responsible for the communication between disjoint clusters of nodes [38], [39]. However, this approach poses significant capacity and availability requirements for the superpeers and heavily affects the load balancing character of DHTs.…”
Section: ) Impact Of Churnmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This issue is also addressed by an alternative approach, in which the multilevel structure is achieved based on the existence of superpeers i.e., nodes responsible for the communication between disjoint clusters of nodes [38], [39]. However, this approach poses significant capacity and availability requirements for the superpeers and heavily affects the load balancing character of DHTs.…”
Section: ) Impact Of Churnmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…resource levels. On the other hand, in hierarchical DHTs based on two-tiered peer capabilities (such as [1,10,25]) where nodes assume the roles of super-peer or leaf-peer, lookups are routed directly from leaf nodes to parent nodes. The parent (or super) nodes are fully responsible for performing lookup routing, completely neglecting the varying nuances of nodes' resource availabilities.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, these approaches are difficult to adapt to our scenario. Firstly, the structural approaches which are capable of reducing the communication overhead of low resource nodes incorporate only two resource levels: "have" or "have not"(for example [1,10,25]). Secondly, the virtual nodes and node movement approaches, which allocate varying quantities of data to each physical node, actually introduce more maintenance overhead and churn into the network.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Efficient cooperation between heterogeneous overlays has served as an inspiration to a number of research efforts, which include concepts such as cooperation via gateway (in [5,6]), cooperation via super-overlay (in [11,15]), cooperation via hierarchy (in [8,9,16]), merging of overlays (in [6,7,14]), and hybrid overlay systems (in [4,13]). These efforts and concepts have been described and contrasted to our approach in more detail in [17], while here we only mention that we share their common idea of increasing locality in the network, and have the most features in common with the 'cooperation via hierarchy' approach.…”
Section: Introduction and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%