2022
DOI: 10.1109/lra.2022.3148489
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hierarchical Planning for Heterogeneous Multi-Robot Routing Problems via Learned Subteam Performance

Abstract: This paper considers a particular class of multirobot task allocation problems, where tasks correspond to heterogeneous multi-robot routing problems defined on different areas of a given environment. We present a hierarchical planner that breaks down the complexity of this problem into two subproblems: the high-level problem of allocating robots to routing tasks, and the low-level problem of computing the actual routing paths for each subteam. The planner uses a Graph Neural Network (GNN) as a heuristic to est… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Existing approaches to SRS mission-planning can be categorized based on the operational limitations considered in their formulation, including computational, locomotion, and localization ones. Studies that are most similar to the work proposed in this paper, typically, address locomotion [10][11][12][13][14][15][16] and localization [17][18][19][20] limitations of the swarm. These along with other works related to swarm missionplanning are reviewed below in detail.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Existing approaches to SRS mission-planning can be categorized based on the operational limitations considered in their formulation, including computational, locomotion, and localization ones. Studies that are most similar to the work proposed in this paper, typically, address locomotion [10][11][12][13][14][15][16] and localization [17][18][19][20] limitations of the swarm. These along with other works related to swarm missionplanning are reviewed below in detail.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The locomotion limitations of swarm robots would affect the executability of the trajectories that are planned for a task-allocation solution considered. In such cases, the literature advocates that if a robot trajectory is not executable within the limits of its capabilities, changes must be made to the mission plan at the task-allocation level [10][11][12][13][14][15][16]. This represents a constrained mission-planning problem and calls for a strategy that searches for the optimal task-allocation and swarm trajectories concurrently.…”
Section: Locomotion Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At last we discuss the topic of learning sub-team performance as an additional future research direction for advancing multi-robot searching systems. In Banfi et al. (2022) , hierarchical planning for heterogeneous multi-robot routing problems via learned sub-team performance is examined in a different context than search and rescue applications however ideas drawn from the paper may be applied in this context as well.…”
Section: A View On Current Research Trends In Multi-agent Searchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our setting, we assume that robots belonging to a heterogeneous team have Fig. 1: Polypixel, a simulated urban environment used for our experiments (as seen in [7]), with its graph-based abstraction superimposed. Vertices show locations where a task has been assigned to one or more robots of a heterogeneous team.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We show that the use of CS-HSSRG for dealing with the scheduling part of the problem within the stateof-the-art multi-agent coordination planner GRSTAPS [12] results in decisions about what tasks to include in the plan and what robots to allocate to those tasks that are robust to temporal uncertainty. The proposed approach is fundamentally centralized and offline, similarly to many recent works in the same area [13,3,14,12,7], and centralization of the planner is often imposed by operational constraints. However, our approach is experimentally efficient enough to allow online replanning phases which may be triggered by different events such as subteams becoming disconnected.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%