2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.physa.2009.05.033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hierarchical structures in the Gross Domestic Product per capita fluctuation in Latin American countries

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
14
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
2
14
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A principal component analysis has further been applied in order to observe and corroborate whether a country clustering structure truly exists (Redelico et al 2009), and the results confirmed previously expected results.…”
Section: Economics: Gross Domestic Product and Other Macroeconomic Insupporting
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A principal component analysis has further been applied in order to observe and corroborate whether a country clustering structure truly exists (Redelico et al 2009), and the results confirmed previously expected results.…”
Section: Economics: Gross Domestic Product and Other Macroeconomic Insupporting
confidence: 77%
“…A new methodological framework for investigating macroeconomic time series has been introduced in Redelico et al (2009), based on a non-linear correlation coefficient. Features related directly to the Latin American, rather than EU, countries have been described, i.e.…”
Section: Economics: Gross Domestic Product and Other Macroeconomic Inmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One can mention, among other works, Redelico et al (2009) and Gligor and Ausloos (2007) who used the Student's t-test; Clippe and Ausloos (2012) and Mir et al (2014) who used a chi-square test; and also Queiros (2005), Zanin et al (2012), Theiler et al (1992) or Morales et al (2013). However, as some econophysicists pointed out, "better and more careful testing is needed, and that too much of data analysis in this area relies on visual inspection alone" (Farmer & Geanakoplos, 2008, p. 24).…”
Section: V) Can One Give Up Emh?mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…[42] or Ref. [56]. This is due to the low value of N ij , reflecting the low GCC value for the whole network, i.e.…”
Section: Average Overlap Indexmentioning
confidence: 99%