2012
DOI: 10.1186/1472-6947-12-56
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High acceptability for cell phone text messages to improve communication of laboratory results with HIV-infected patients in rural Uganda: a cross-sectional survey study

Abstract: BackgroundPatient-provider communication is a major challenge in resource-limited settings with large catchment areas. Though mobile phone usership increased 20-fold in Africa over the past decade, little is known about acceptability of, perceptions about disclosure and confidentiality, and preferences for cell phone communication of health information in the region.MethodsWe performed structured interviews of fifty patients at the Immune Suppression Syndrome clinic in Mbarara, Uganda to assess four domains of… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
104
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 90 publications
(110 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
5
104
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Specifically, studies have found high rates of acceptability for laboratory notification and adherence and appointment reminders. A study from Uganda evaluated individuals' interest in an SMS-based laboratory notification system and found that all 50 participants would like to receive such notifications; the majority cited expectations for improved communication and improved clinical care [38]. Similarly, in a pre-rollout qualitative acceptability study of WelTel Retain, both HIV-infected individuals and clinicians felt that the SMS intervention would improve communication and lead to early identification of clinical problems, resulting in improved retention [40].…”
Section: Uptake/acceptabilitymentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Specifically, studies have found high rates of acceptability for laboratory notification and adherence and appointment reminders. A study from Uganda evaluated individuals' interest in an SMS-based laboratory notification system and found that all 50 participants would like to receive such notifications; the majority cited expectations for improved communication and improved clinical care [38]. Similarly, in a pre-rollout qualitative acceptability study of WelTel Retain, both HIV-infected individuals and clinicians felt that the SMS intervention would improve communication and lead to early identification of clinical problems, resulting in improved retention [40].…”
Section: Uptake/acceptabilitymentioning
confidence: 97%
“…One recent study estimated that after accounting for system development and fixed and marginal costs, rollout of a cell phone-based adherence intervention among the 600,000 PLWHA in India on first-line ART would cost between $1.27 and $1.77 per individual per year [37]. After start-up costs, the cost of most individual-centered cell phone-based interventions (excluding the cost of the phone itself, which most individuals own), is quite low (e.g., each SMS in Uganda is approximately $0.04 [38]). Some evidence also suggests that individuals would be willing to pay for cell phone-based adherence support.…”
Section: Cost-effectivenessmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…[19] Our findings are also consistent with previous work demonstrating that even members of vulnerable populations in Uganda have access to mobile phones. [20][21][22] Only 5% of index patients and 1% of contacts reported that they did not have access to a mobile phone, a functional precondition of household contact investigation in lowincome, urban settings where street addresses are uncommon.…”
Section: Formentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The graphics quality, reliability and speed of short message service (SMS) data transfer, confidentiality and the use of varieties of language tailored to the target audience, based on unique characteristics and the outcome of interest or untailored to address the overall target population are acceptable by women across all culture, ethnicity, religion and social divide [2,49,[55][56][57][58].…”
Section: Gender Cultural and Political Feasibilitymentioning
confidence: 99%