2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.cag.2017.02.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High accuracy pixel-wise spatial calibration of optical see-through glasses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
8
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
2
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The experiment results suggested that the calibration refinement step accounting for the user's eye position was paramount to achieve accurate results also for eye positions different from the reference one for all those OST HMDs with finite focal distances (i.e., not parallax-free OST HMDs). This was in accordance with what was suggested by Owen et al [14] and contrary to what was hypothesized by Gilson et al and by [34] et al It should be also stressed that this assumption was clearly different from what was suggested in [20] (page 58), where the classification of the OST HMDs was made based on the level of complexity of the OST optical combiner: "these results show that the triangulation approach only works for OSTG with simple optics and that it is not a universal approach".…”
Section: Quantitative Evaluation Of Virtual-to-real Registration Accusupporting
confidence: 88%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The experiment results suggested that the calibration refinement step accounting for the user's eye position was paramount to achieve accurate results also for eye positions different from the reference one for all those OST HMDs with finite focal distances (i.e., not parallax-free OST HMDs). This was in accordance with what was suggested by Owen et al [14] and contrary to what was hypothesized by Gilson et al and by [34] et al It should be also stressed that this assumption was clearly different from what was suggested in [20] (page 58), where the classification of the OST HMDs was made based on the level of complexity of the OST optical combiner: "these results show that the triangulation approach only works for OSTG with simple optics and that it is not a universal approach".…”
Section: Quantitative Evaluation Of Virtual-to-real Registration Accusupporting
confidence: 88%
“…This explained the values of the angular errors obtained. If we considered the absolute error at the distance where the validation checkerboard was placed (≈650 mm), our results were comparable to those obtained with the camera based triangulation approach proposed by Klemm et al [20]. The experiment results suggested that the calibration refinement step accounting for the user's eye position was paramount to achieve accurate results also for eye positions different from the reference one for all those OST HMDs with finite focal distances (i.e., not parallax-free OST HMDs).…”
Section: Quantitative Evaluation Of Virtual-to-real Registration Accusupporting
confidence: 83%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…To achieve high tracking accuracy, the optical elements used have to be calibrated. We used the high-precision, non-model-based camera calibration technique described in 26 for both camera calibration and the calibration of the HMOST glasses, as discussed in 27 . With this calibration technique, it was possible to achieve the maximum accuracy throughout the entire imaging process of the camera.…”
Section: Trackingmentioning
confidence: 99%