2016 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/icra.2016.7487579
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High accurate robotic drilling with external sensor and compliance model-based compensation

Abstract: High accurate absolute robot positioning is a requirement, and still a challenge, in many applications, such as drilling in the aerospace industry. The accuracy is affected due to many sources of errors from robot model, tool calibration, sensor and product uncertainties. While model-based error compensation cannot reach the desired accuracy, sensor-based compensation appears as the practical solution to increase the robot positioning accuracy. A structured analysis of the error sources in robotic manufacturin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…9b. A similar error reduction was reported in [20,27,28], but it was achieved by using real-time feedback from external sensors. Other techniques based on interpolation do not need dynamic tracking of robot movement (similar to our approach), but they reduced only position error [31,32].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 53%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…9b. A similar error reduction was reported in [20,27,28], but it was achieved by using real-time feedback from external sensors. Other techniques based on interpolation do not need dynamic tracking of robot movement (similar to our approach), but they reduced only position error [31,32].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…Active control based on external sensors was also used for automated welding of aerospace components [19]. Localization error in accurate robotic drilling was reduced to 0.1 mm and 0.2° using an external sensor and compliance compensation [20]. Even as these active control techniques (as well as other passive or hybrid compliance strategies [21][22][23]) enable the completion of tasks requiring high accuracy, they could still benefit from reduced localization error.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wong et al [3] presented the vision guided error measurement system in a robot for surgical drilling. The robot used lasers to maintain its position throughout the process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In one of our last publications, an error source structure for the identification and model-based compensation of errors in robotic manufacturing has been proposed using the Product, Process and Resource model (PPR) [8]. A comparison between sensor-based and compliance model-based compensation for robotic drilling has been presented [8]. This model has been extended in this publication into an architecture for optimizing robot machining motions optimizing robot stiffness.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In conjunction with the identification of limitations, several researchers have also experimentally determined error sources [6] and proposed strategies for improving robotic machining accuracy through modular compensation [7], which could be a way for increasing the robot accuracy and its accurate programmability. In one of our last publications, an error source structure for the identification and model-based compensation of errors in robotic manufacturing has been proposed using the Product, Process and Resource model (PPR) [8]. A comparison between sensor-based and compliance model-based compensation for robotic drilling has been presented [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%