2021
DOI: 10.1029/2020ja028959
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High‐Altitude Polar NM With the New DAQ System as a Tool to Study Details of the Cosmic‐Ray Induced Nucleonic Cascade

Abstract: NMs record primarily the secondary nucleonic component (mostly neutrons) of the cosmic-ray induced atmospheric cascade with a small fraction of counts caused by muons. Its count rate is defined by the flux of primary (impinging on the top of the atmosphere) cosmic rays, as a combination of the cosmic-ray energy spectrum, detector's yield function and geomagnetic rigidity cutoff (Clem & Dorman, 2000;Mishev et al., 2020). The NM is an energy-integrating detector, with the effective energy ranging from about 12 G… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The simulated time distribution of pulses in this range due to charged atmospheric secondary particles passing through the scintillator and PIN array is shown in Figure 3(c). These pulses are exclusively due to neutron capture by 10 B. Keeping in mind that the simulation does not include the uniform background of NM pulses that are unrelated to the charged-particle trigger, and the simulation has a different overall number of pulses than the experiment, the qualitative agreement between this simulated distribution and the experimental distribution in Figure 3(a) is quite close, except that the simulated distribution does not have a strong spike near t = 0.…”
Section: Overview Of Propagation Time Distributionmentioning
confidence: 70%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The simulated time distribution of pulses in this range due to charged atmospheric secondary particles passing through the scintillator and PIN array is shown in Figure 3(c). These pulses are exclusively due to neutron capture by 10 B. Keeping in mind that the simulation does not include the uniform background of NM pulses that are unrelated to the charged-particle trigger, and the simulation has a different overall number of pulses than the experiment, the qualitative agreement between this simulated distribution and the experimental distribution in Figure 3(a) is quite close, except that the simulated distribution does not have a strong spike near t = 0.…”
Section: Overview Of Propagation Time Distributionmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…We expect that the measured pulse height in the proportional counter corresponds proportionately to the simulated energy deposition. Based on a correspondence between the peak pulse height of observed NM pulses and the most probable energy release from 10 B fission (2.310 MeV), the high pulse height range of PH ≥ 1 V corresponds to energy deposition E d ≥ 1.36 MeV. The simulated time distribution of pulses in this range due to charged atmospheric secondary particles passing through the scintillator and PIN array is shown in Figure 3(c).…”
Section: Overview Of Propagation Time Distributionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations