2013
DOI: 10.1111/apha.12192
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High‐ and low‐protein gestation diets do not provoke common transcriptional responses representing universal target‐pathways in muscle and liver of porcine progeny

Abstract: The factors tissue, stage and diet impact gene expression in a hierarchical order. Porcine liver appeared to be a tissue that was more resilient to nutritional modulation compared with skeletal muscle tissue. Differential modulation between tissues and dietary groups reveal that there are no universal target-pathways of adaptive transcriptional response to different protein diets.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
(102 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, researchers found that expression of genes related to oxidative phosphorylation and fatty acid metabolism were increased in LP compared with HP skeletal muscle. Based upon these transcriptional comparisons between differing tissue and dietary insults, researchers within this study concluded that liver tissue may be highly resilient to nutritional alternations whereas, skeletal muscle tissue may be less resilient to nutritional insults and is more likely to show more transcriptional differences than the liver when the gestational diet has been altered [ 91 ]. Perhaps in the event of nutritional inadequacy during fetal development, differing tissues do not experience a common transcriptional response or follow a universal target pathway in epigenetic variations.…”
Section: Maternal Protein Intake and Fetal Programmingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, researchers found that expression of genes related to oxidative phosphorylation and fatty acid metabolism were increased in LP compared with HP skeletal muscle. Based upon these transcriptional comparisons between differing tissue and dietary insults, researchers within this study concluded that liver tissue may be highly resilient to nutritional alternations whereas, skeletal muscle tissue may be less resilient to nutritional insults and is more likely to show more transcriptional differences than the liver when the gestational diet has been altered [ 91 ]. Perhaps in the event of nutritional inadequacy during fetal development, differing tissues do not experience a common transcriptional response or follow a universal target pathway in epigenetic variations.…”
Section: Maternal Protein Intake and Fetal Programmingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…High intake of animal proteins could increase the acid load in the circulation [18], thereby promoting the formation of stress fiber mediated by RhoA in enhancing focal adhesion mechanism [18]. Oster and co-workers [41] undertook microarray analyses on skeletal muscle tissue of 253 offspring of German gilts fed with iso-caloric diets showed that the transcriptional pathway of Rho GTPase decreased in “low-protein/high-carbohydrate” diet after 188 days follow-up at postnatal subjects. Garcia et al [42] indicated that treatment with arachidonic acid in MDA-MB-435 human melanoma cells can activate RhoA promoting cell adhesion via p38 MAPK- RhoA signaling pathway.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, embryonic and fetal development are periods of rapid growth and cell differentiation and predetermination of later life. Adverse environmental conditions during embryonic and fetal development provoke an adaptive response, which may lead to both persistently biased responsiveness to extrinsic factors and permanent consequences for the organismal phenotype [ 10 , 11 ]. The in-ovo development of the poultry is an ideal model for studying the impact of exogenous (physical) effects and analysing mechanisms of gene-environment interactions taking place during embryonic development and potentially affecting later life time development.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%