2022
DOI: 10.1002/lol2.10267
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High biomass turnover rates of endosymbiotic nitrogen‐fixing cyanobacteria in the western Bering Sea

Abstract: Recent studies have described active nitrogen fixation in high‐latitude waters, but the ecological controls on the occurrence or activity of nitrogen‐fixing organisms (diazotrophs) in such systems remain unknown. Turnover rates and top‐down controls are also general knowledge gaps for marine diazotrophs. We detected abundant UCYN‐A (endosymbiotic nitrogen‐fixing cyanobacteria) in the Gulf of Anadyr, western Bering Sea, which correlated with high dissolved iron to dissolved inorganic nitrogen ratios (Fe : DIN) … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
10
1

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
2
10
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Primers and probes designed in previous studies were used: UCYN‐A1 (Church et al., 2005), UCYN‐A2 (Thompson et al., 2014), UCYN‐B (Moisander et al., 2010), and UCYN‐C (Foster et al., 2007). It should be noted that the qPCR assay to estimate the abundances of UCYN‐A2 also amplifies the nifH genes of UCYN‐A3 and UCYN‐A4 due to cross‐reactivity between assays, so we defined the signal detected with the UCYN‐A2 qPCR assay as the abundance of UCYN‐A2/3/4 (Cheung et al., 2022; Farnelid et al., 2016). The standard curves were generated by 5‐fold serial dilution from linearized recombinant plasmids and the qPCR efficiency varied between 97% and 103%.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Primers and probes designed in previous studies were used: UCYN‐A1 (Church et al., 2005), UCYN‐A2 (Thompson et al., 2014), UCYN‐B (Moisander et al., 2010), and UCYN‐C (Foster et al., 2007). It should be noted that the qPCR assay to estimate the abundances of UCYN‐A2 also amplifies the nifH genes of UCYN‐A3 and UCYN‐A4 due to cross‐reactivity between assays, so we defined the signal detected with the UCYN‐A2 qPCR assay as the abundance of UCYN‐A2/3/4 (Cheung et al., 2022; Farnelid et al., 2016). The standard curves were generated by 5‐fold serial dilution from linearized recombinant plasmids and the qPCR efficiency varied between 97% and 103%.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recently, Cheung et al. (2022) reported that UCYN‐A sublineages displayed high biomass turnover rates compared to the total phytoplankton community in the western Bering Sea. Nevertheless, the grazing rates of all major UCD groups (UCYN‐A, UCYN‐B, and UCYN‐C) have not been compared in the same water column.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The dilution technique does, however, offer a distinct advantage for integrating bacteria into a broader food web context by providing estimates of their growth and grazing mortality rates in the same incubations that measure the growth and grazing of phototrophic microbes ( Prochlorococcus , Synechococcus , picoeukaryotes) as well as other phytoplankton (e.g., Landry et al 2022 a ). The expanding usage of sequence analyses with dilution experiments to resolve species‐ and clade‐specific differences in growth and grazing dynamics (Yokokawa and Hagata 2005; Cheung et al 2022) can also be expected to amplify this advantage in the future. It is therefore useful to know that BCP Dil results can be compatible with BCP Leu , given appropriate attention to bacteria cell carbon content.…”
Section: Comments and Recommendationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dilution experiments also differ from 3 H‐leucine assays in their potential to compare the vital rates of different microbial populations to one another in the same incubations. Therefore, if dilution results are compatible to 3 H‐leucine for bacteria in aggregate, the population‐distinguishing advantage of dilutions could be useful as a tool for integrating bacterial production into food web studies relative to phototrophic microbes as well as for using molecular sequence techniques to quantify potential differences and growth‐mortality tradeoffs among co‐occurring microbes (Yokokawa and Hagata 2005; Cheung et al 2022).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%