2021
DOI: 10.1080/21645515.2021.1904758
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High coverage of diverse invasive meningococcal serogroup B strains by the 4-component vaccine 4CMenB in Australia, 2007–2011: Concordant predictions between MATS and genetic MATS

Abstract: Meningococcal serogroup B (MenB) accounts for an important proportion of invasive meningococcal disease (IMD). The 4-component vaccine against MenB (4CMenB) is composed of factor H binding protein (fHbp), neisserial heparin-binding antigen (NHBA), Neisseria adhesin A (NadA), and outer membrane vesicles of the New Zealand strain with Porin 1.4. A meningococcal antigen typing system (MATS) and a fully genomic approach, genetic MATS (gMATS), were developed to predict coverage of MenB strains by 4CMenB. We charact… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 34 publications
(70 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our predicted coverage is in line with previous studies reporting overall predicted strain coverage rates of 69–78% by the 4CMenB vaccine, and adults being on the lower end of the range. 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 However, most studies used genetic Meningococcal Antigen Typing System (gMATS). The gMATS excludes the NadA antigen, and considers a number of different alleles as covered or not covered, which may cause slightly higher or lower predicted coverage.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our predicted coverage is in line with previous studies reporting overall predicted strain coverage rates of 69–78% by the 4CMenB vaccine, and adults being on the lower end of the range. 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 However, most studies used genetic Meningococcal Antigen Typing System (gMATS). The gMATS excludes the NadA antigen, and considers a number of different alleles as covered or not covered, which may cause slightly higher or lower predicted coverage.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%