2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2015.03.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High-density 1.54 μm InAs/InGaAlAs/InP(100) based quantum dots with reduced size inhomogeneity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Here, the QD density is about 3×10 10 /cm 2 , a typical value for the InAs/InP QDs system. [22][23] It was also uncovered that a higher QD density can be achieved by stacking the InAs/InP QDs. 24 Moreover, more quantum dot stacks can facilitate the interaction of dislocations and the strain field of the QDs, enhancing the bending effect of propagated dislocations.…”
Section: Dislocation Filtering Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, the QD density is about 3×10 10 /cm 2 , a typical value for the InAs/InP QDs system. [22][23] It was also uncovered that a higher QD density can be achieved by stacking the InAs/InP QDs. 24 Moreover, more quantum dot stacks can facilitate the interaction of dislocations and the strain field of the QDs, enhancing the bending effect of propagated dislocations.…”
Section: Dislocation Filtering Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 depicts an atomic force microscope image of a single QD layer as well as a high resolution transmission electron microscope cross section of the six layer structure. The QDs exhibit record uniformity characterized by the photoluminescence linewidth at 10 K which was 17 meV and 26 meV a single QD layer and for the six layer stack, respectively [31]. The emission power of the measured electro-luminescence spectra increases with applied bias but the spectral shape remains unchanged [32].…”
Section: Experimental Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…11 Similarly, it was reported that the growth condition of an InAlGaAs buffer layer can significantly affect the QD morphology and densities. 12,13 On the contrary, Stintz et al argued that the InAs nanostructure is largely determined by the number of InAs monolayers (MLs), independent from other factors such as buffer layer growth condition. 14 Another important growth parameter for InAs QD morphology is growth interruption (GI), which often allows QDs to reorganize through a ripening process before they are capped by a subsequent layer.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%