2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2019.106435
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High-density thermal sensitivity maps of the human body

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
47
1
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 100 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
3
47
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, we know that despite differences in the quality and quantity of nociceptors, hairy and glabrous skin share similar nociceptive afferents, with non-significant differences in pain sensations or brain potentials in terms of latency and amplitude (Iannetti, Zambreanu and Tracey, 2006). A recent study reported similar thresholds for cooling and warming in the forearm and the palm of the hand (Luo et al, 2020); however, the dorsum of the hand (hairy skin) was reported to be more thermally sensitive than the palm (non-hairy). To the best of our knowledge, it is not known whether the observed differences in sensitivity are due to the presence of fewer thermal receptors on the palm than on the forearm (but see Watkins et al, 2020 for a recent work on different CT densities in hairy and non-hairy skin).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Furthermore, we know that despite differences in the quality and quantity of nociceptors, hairy and glabrous skin share similar nociceptive afferents, with non-significant differences in pain sensations or brain potentials in terms of latency and amplitude (Iannetti, Zambreanu and Tracey, 2006). A recent study reported similar thresholds for cooling and warming in the forearm and the palm of the hand (Luo et al, 2020); however, the dorsum of the hand (hairy skin) was reported to be more thermally sensitive than the palm (non-hairy). To the best of our knowledge, it is not known whether the observed differences in sensitivity are due to the presence of fewer thermal receptors on the palm than on the forearm (but see Watkins et al, 2020 for a recent work on different CT densities in hairy and non-hairy skin).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The thermal sensitivity of face skin in responding to changes in temperature to changes in exposure to the thermal environment is between 0.30 and 0.52 � C for changes in operative temperature of 1 � C. This value is relatively higher compared to the thermal sensitivity of body skin in Figure 6, which is 0.26 � C for changes in operative temperature of 1 � C. 20 The thermal sensitivity of the nose skin is highest compared to other measurement points on the face, and it is similar to the results of a previous study. 25,28 It is indicated by the value of the gradient measured by the camera thermal and thermocouple in Figure 6 of 0.50 and 0.52 � C for changes in operative temperature of 1 � C. The thermal sensitivity of the nose skin is higher because the number of blood vessels in this part is higher compared to others.…”
Section: The Relationship Between Face Skin Temperatures Measured Using a Thermal Camera With Mstmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…It can be used as a physiological index for describing the thermal sensation. 18 According to Luo et al, 20 thermal sensitivity variations exist between areas in the body parts, which are observed up to two to three times bigger than variations due to gender difference. The adaptation level differences are shown by each different body part.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it may be useful to apply sensitivity weightings to simulated receptor impulses at different body sites to reflect the downstream integration and processing of thermoafferents by the central nervous system. Investigations of regional thermosensitivity by Zhang et al (2010b), Cotter and Taylor (2005), Filingeri et al (2017), and Luo et al (2020 all offer weighting coefficients that could be adopted in future modelling efforts.…”
Section: Indoor Air May 2021mentioning
confidence: 99%