2017
DOI: 10.1109/tcsi.2017.2705051
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High-Dimensional Computing as a Nanoscalable Paradigm

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
86
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 124 publications
(86 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
86
0
Order By: Relevance
“…is is equal to computing the population count of a hypervector binding those two hypervectors. So far, digital methods for AMs count through all components resulting in a classi cation latency in the order O(D) [8,9,29,32]. We focus on reducing this latency by adding up all hypervector components.…”
Section: Associative Memory (Am)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…is is equal to computing the population count of a hypervector binding those two hypervectors. So far, digital methods for AMs count through all components resulting in a classi cation latency in the order O(D) [8,9,29,32]. We focus on reducing this latency by adding up all hypervector components.…”
Section: Associative Memory (Am)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This lets us combine two such vectors into a new vector using well-defined vector space operations, while keeping the information of the two vectors with high probability. HD computing has further unique features including fast learning, robustness, and efficiency of realization [10].…”
Section: B Hyperdimensional (Hd) Computingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The AM compares the query hypervectors to all learned prototype hypervectors, and returns the label of the one that has the minimum Hamming distance. Since these three modules are commonly used across various applications of HD computing [19][20][21], we target their accelerations to achieve end-to-end benefits in learning and classification tasks.…”
Section: Modules Of Hd Classifiermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mean classification accuracy of gestures among five subjects is 89.6% with SVM, and 92.4% with the HD classifier. More importantly, the HD classifier exhibits a graceful degradation with lower dimensionality, or faulty components, allowing a trade-off between the application's accuracy and the available hardware resources in a platform [19,20]. We can exploit this graceful degradation capability by reducing the dimensionality of hypervectors that eases the execution on the commercial ARM Cortex M4.…”
Section: Comparison With Svm On Arm Cortex M4mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation