2020
DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.102.076016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High-energy phase diagrams with charge and isospin axes under heavy-ion collision and stellar conditions

Abstract: We investigate the phase transition from hadron to quark matter in the general case without the assumption of chemical equilibrium with respect to weak decays. The effects of net strangeness on charge and isospin fractions, chemical potentials, and temperature are studied in the context of the Chiral Mean Field (CMF) model that incorporates chiral symmetry restoration and deconfinement. The extent to which these quantities are probed during deconfinement in conditions expected to exist in protoneutron stars, b… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 111 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To identify the position of the phase transition region, we vary, for each temperature T and charge or isospin fraction (Y Q or Y I ), the Gibbs free energy per baryon of the system̃until we find a discontinuity in the order parameters. The free energy, by definition, is the same on the hadronic and quark sides of the deconfinement phase transition and can be used to calculate the baryon chemical potential B on each side of the coexistence region, either fixing the charge or isospin fraction in the system (Aryal et al 2020):…”
Section: Formalism and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…To identify the position of the phase transition region, we vary, for each temperature T and charge or isospin fraction (Y Q or Y I ), the Gibbs free energy per baryon of the system̃until we find a discontinuity in the order parameters. The free energy, by definition, is the same on the hadronic and quark sides of the deconfinement phase transition and can be used to calculate the baryon chemical potential B on each side of the coexistence region, either fixing the charge or isospin fraction in the system (Aryal et al 2020):…”
Section: Formalism and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To identify the position of the phase transition region, we vary, for each temperature T and charge or isospin fraction ( Y Q or Y I ), the Gibbs free energy per baryon of the system μtrue˜ until we find a discontinuity in the order parameters. The free energy, by definition, is the same on the hadronic and quark sides of the deconfinement phase transition and can be used to calculate the baryon chemical potential μ B on each side of the coexistence region, either fixing the charge or isospin fraction in the system (Aryal et al 2020): μB=μtrue˜YQμQ, μB=μtrue˜YI+1/212YSμI, where the charge fraction YQ=QB, the isospin fraction YI=IB, and the strangeness fraction YS=SB are defined as the respective quantum numbers divided by the number of baryons in the system. Note that if we had imposed zero net strangeness (which we did not do in this work), the relation between isospin fraction and charge fraction would be trivial, Y Q = Y I + 1/2.…”
Section: Formalism and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In the past, this formalism was used to simulate particle multiplicities, rapidity distributions, and flow in heavy-ion collisions [100] and the differences among stellar matter vs. matter produced in heavy-ion collisions in the vicinity of the deconfinement coexistence line, drawing analogies with the nuclear liquid-gas phase diagram [96]. More recently, we used this formalism to construct three-dimensional QCD phase diagrams up to a temperature T = 160 MeV, the other two axes being the chemical potential (µ B or μ), and either the charge or isospin fractions [101]. In this work, we go further by extending coexistence lines all the way to the respective critical end points and discussing the effects of different conditions on the relative position of the critical end points.…”
Section: Our Formalismmentioning
confidence: 99%