Objective-Ictal events occurring in temporal lobe epilepsy patients and in experimental models mimicking this neurological disorder can be classified, based on their onset pattern, into lowvoltage, fast versus hypersynchronous onset seizures. It has been suggested that the low-voltage, fast onset pattern is mainly contributed by interneuronal (γ-aminobutyric acidergic) signaling, whereas the hypersynchronous onset involves the activation of principal (glutamatergic) cells.Methods-Here, we tested this hypothesis using the optogenetic control of parvalbumin-positive or somatostatin-positive interneurons and of calmodulin-dependent, protein kinase-positive, principal cells in the mouse entorhinal cortex in the in vitro 4-aminopyridine model of epileptiform synchronization.Results-We found that during 4-aminopyridine application, both spontaneous seizure-like events and those induced by optogenetic activation of interneurons displayed low-voltage, fast onset patterns that were associated with a higher occurrence of ripples than of fast ripples. In contrast, seizures induced by the optogenetic activation of principal cells had a hypersynchronous onset pattern with fast ripple rates that were higher than those of ripples.Interpretation-Our results firmly establish that under a similar experimental condition (ie, bath application of 4-aminopyridine), the initiation of low-voltage, fast and of hypersynchronous onset seizures in the entorhinal cortex depends on the preponderant involvement of interneuronal and principal cell networks, respectively.Seizures in patients presenting with temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE) are mainly characterized by 2 distinct electrographic onset patterns, defined as low-voltage, fast (LVF) and hypersynchronous (HYP). 1,2 LVF seizures are characterized at onset by the occurrence of a sentinel spike followed by low-amplitude, high-frequency activity, whereas the initiation of Recently, the analysis of high-frequency oscillations (HFOs; ripples: 80-200Hz, fast ripples: 250-500Hz) during spontaneous HYP and LVF seizures in the pilocarpine and kainic acid model of TLE has suggested that these 2 seizure onset patterns may rely on distinct mechanisms of initiation. LVF seizures were found to be mainly associated with HFOs in the ripple frequency range, thus suggesting the predominant involvement of interneuronal (inhibitory) networks; in contrast, HYP seizures were mostly accompanied by fast ripple occurrence, thus highlighting the potential role of principal (glutamatergic) networks. 6,7 Evidence obtained to date suggests that pathologic HFOs in the ripple band should represent population inhibitory postsynaptic potentials generated by principal neurons entrained by synchronously active interneuron networks, whereas those in the fast ripple band reflect the synchronous firing of abnormally active principal cells, and thus are not dependent on inhibitory processes. [8][9][10] It has been demonstrated that 4-aminopyridine (4AP) application induces LVF onset discharges in several limbic and para...