Obesity is now being recognized as a neurobehavioral disorder. Although the view of appetite as an addiction to food is controversial, there are useful lessons to be learned from the neuroscience of addiction for understanding obesity. The speakers in this symposium all addressed different aspects of the neurobiology of feeding and obesity. In this overview and the associated reviews, the behavioral, genetic and neural factors that promote over-eating in animals and humans are discussed. International Journal of Obesity (2009) 33, S30-S33; doi:10.1038/ijo.2009 Keywords: dopamine; striatum; amygdala; insula; orbitofrontal cortexIn 1949, Donald Hebb 1 suggested that hunger could be viewed as an addiction, an idea he attributes to the physiologist AJ Carlson in 1916. Hebb proposed that hunger was a learned behavior, in which eating is initially reinforcing because it reverses an unpleasant bodily signal (change in nutrient levels in blood, hunger hormones and stomach contractions). With time the behavior becomes organized and food cues, such as the sight and smell of food, develop the ability to induce craving, approach and consumption, much as drug-associated cues do. Later, Roy Wise 2 showed that dopamine receptor blockade with a neuroleptic attenuated the reinforcing effects food, as it did for stimulant drugs and electrical brain stimulation, leading him to conclude that addictive drugs act on brain circuitry that controls feeding. The notion of hunger as addiction has been criticized in the media, 3 and for seemingly contradictory reasons: referring to the obese as 'addicts' either unfairly stigmatizes them or undeservedly exculpates them. (Note that even the view of drug addiction as a brain disease is still rejected by some.) On the other hand, some governments are sold on the analogy, having mandated cigarette-style health warnings on food advertisements. 4 It must be admitted, however, that opponents of the addiction model are correct in pointing out the paradox of ascribing energy intake, the most basic survival behavior, to aberrant function of neurobiological systems. Nonetheless, evidence of parallels between addiction and feeding behavior continues to accumulate at the neurobiological and behavioral levels (for example, see Grigson 5 for a review). Perhaps a less controversial position could be that we have much to learn about obesity from the neuroscience of addiction. 6 Neural systems implicated in feeding are depicted in Figure 1. According to this model four heavily interconnected structures (shown in gray in the figure), the amygdala/hippocampus, insula, orbitofrontal cortex (OFC), and striatum are the central elements in the control of appetitive behavior. Although a specific role for each node within the network can be differentiated, as a group these structures are involved in (1) learning about (food) rewards; (2) allocating attention and effort towards (food) rewards; (3) setting the incentive value of stimuli in the environment; (4) integrating homeostatic information about energy stores an...