Certain highly soluble proteins, such as Escherichia coli maltose-binding protein (MBP), have the ability to enhance the solubility of their fusion partners, making them attractive vehicles for the production of recombinant proteins, yet the mechanism of solubility enhancement remains poorly understood. Here, we report that the solubility-enhancing properties of MBP are dramatically affected by amino acid substitutions that alter the equilibrium between its "open" and "closed" conformations. Our findings indicate that the solubility-enhancing activity of MBP is mediated by its open conformation and point to a likely role for the ligand-binding cleft in the mechanism of solubility enhancement.Keywords maltose binding protein; solubility enhancer; affinity tag; fusion protein; solubility tag Proteins that normally accumulate in the form of insoluble aggregates when they are overproduced in E. coli can sometimes be recovered in a soluble, properly folded form if they are fused to a solubility-enhancing partner [1]. Consequently, the use of solubility-enhancing fusion partners has become an attractive alternative to the refolding of proteins. Many proteins have been reported to exhibit solubility-enhancing characteristics, including MBP, NusA, DsbA, thioredoxin, T7PK, Skp, SUMO, GB1 and the ZZ domain [2], although the evidence supporting these claims is stronger in some instances than in others. Yet the mechanism(s) by which certain soluble proteins enhance the solubility of their fusion partners remains poorly understood.E. coli MBP is an excellent solubility enhancer [3,4,5,6], but it is not the most effective affinity tag from the standpoint of protein purification [7,8]. Some fusion proteins do not bind efficiently to amylose resin, and even when they do, the purity of proteins after amylose affinity chromatography is usually inadequate. Two groups recently described mutations in MBP that increase its affinity for maltose [9,10]. Using a variety of experimental techniques, both groups reached the conclusion that these mutations exert their effect by altering the equilibrium between the "open" and "closed" conformations of MBP so as to favor the latter. In the open conformation, the ligand-binding cleft of MBP is exposed to solvent, whereas the closed conformation resembles that of the ligand-bound protein in which the cleft is largely buried.* Corresponding author, David S. Waugh, Ph.D., Tel: (301) 846-1842, Fax: (301) 846-7148, Email: waughd@ncifcrf.gov. Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain. We originally set out to determine whether these mutations wou...