2004 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing
DOI: 10.1109/icassp.2004.1325925
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High-level speaker verification with support vector machines

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
91
0
3

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(96 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
2
91
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…In their 2003 NIPS paper, Campbell et al demonstrated a phonetic speaker recognition system based on support vector machines [3]. One of the main innovations of the paper was the following "kernelized" version of the log-likelihood ratio:…”
Section: The Support Vector Machine (Svm) Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…In their 2003 NIPS paper, Campbell et al demonstrated a phonetic speaker recognition system based on support vector machines [3]. One of the main innovations of the paper was the following "kernelized" version of the log-likelihood ratio:…”
Section: The Support Vector Machine (Svm) Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this paper, we compare 1-best phone decodings vs. lattice phone decodings for the purposes of performing phonetic speaker recognition. The phone decodings are used to compute relative frequencies of phone bigrams, which are then used as inputs for two standard phonetic speaker recognition systems: a conventional system based on loglikelihood ratios (LLRs) [1,2], and an SVM-based system similar to that of Campbell et al [3]. The results indicate that lattice decodings provide a much richer sampling of phonetic patterns than 1-best decodings.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations