2016
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201527326
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High-mass X-ray binaries in the Small Magellanic Cloud

Abstract: Aims. The last comprehensive catalogue of high-mass X-ray binaries in the Small Magellanic Cloud (SMC) was published about ten years ago. Since then new such systems were discovered, mainly by X-ray observations with Chandra and XMM-Newton. For the majority of the proposed HMXBs in the SMC no X-ray pulsations were discovered as yet, and unless other properties of the X-ray source and/or the optical counterpart confirm their HMXB nature, they remain only candidate HMXBs. Methods. From a literature search we col… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

20
177
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 157 publications
(197 citation statements)
references
References 105 publications
20
177
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In our classifications listed in Table 7, many of our sources have luminosities and hardness ratios consistent with multiple compact-object types, including accreting black hole primaries. Sources 1728Sources , 1701Sources , 1666Sources , 2012Sources , and 2035 are found in regions of the diagnostic diagrams (Figures 14, 12, 10, 17, 18) consistent with multiple compact-object types -yet all of these XRBs are associated with known X-ray pulsars (Haberl & Sturm 2016). Hereafter, we refer to these sources as inconsistent pulsars, as relates to the NuSTAR hardnessintensity diagram.…”
Section: Classifying Low Luminosity Hmxbsmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In our classifications listed in Table 7, many of our sources have luminosities and hardness ratios consistent with multiple compact-object types, including accreting black hole primaries. Sources 1728Sources , 1701Sources , 1666Sources , 2012Sources , and 2035 are found in regions of the diagnostic diagrams (Figures 14, 12, 10, 17, 18) consistent with multiple compact-object types -yet all of these XRBs are associated with known X-ray pulsars (Haberl & Sturm 2016). Hereafter, we refer to these sources as inconsistent pulsars, as relates to the NuSTAR hardnessintensity diagram.…”
Section: Classifying Low Luminosity Hmxbsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Source 1705 falls along the boundary between the hard state black hole and pulsar loci on our diagnostic diagrams ( Figure 13) during each epoch of observation. Source 1705 is 0.5 away from CXO J005215.4-731915, listed as source 93 in Haberl & Sturm (2016), and 7.5 away from the known pulsar SXP15.3. Based on the results of our timing analysis (see §4.6) we suggest that during the first observation of source 1705 in March 2017 we detected flux predominantly from CXO J005215.4-731915 and during the next two observations in July and August 2017 we detected flux mostly from SXP15.3.…”
Section: Source 1705 -Detection Of Two Be-xrbsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The majority of the isolated pulsars have a spin period distribution that peaks around 1 s, and extends to 10 s. The pulsars in binaries account for only a few percent of all the simulated pulsars, and have a spin period distribution peaking at ∼0.3 s. Unlike the isolated pulsars, very few pulsars in binaries have spin periods beyond ∼1 s. Initially, rapidly spinning pulsars are prevented from accreting material by the propeller mechanism, however once they have spun down sufficiently the NS can accrete material and enter the HMXB phase. The SMC in particular harbours a number of accreting NSs with spin periods below 10 s (see Haberl & Sturm 2016, and references therein). Moreover, the simulations predict a population of ∼60 -160 NSs in binaries with massive companions.…”
Section: Smc Radio Pulsar Populationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The nearest ALLWISE counterpart is much brighter (see below) thereby making this possibility highly unlikely. The Magellanic Clouds, especially the Small Magellanic Cloud, host a large population of HMXBs owing to the relatively recent star formation history (Antoniou et al 2010;Haberl & Sturm 2016;van Jaarsveld et al 2018). To investigate further a possible HMXB nature of the unresolved source, we searched the Magellanic Clouds Photometric Survey (MCPS) catalogue (Zaritsky et al 2004) for a counterpart using the same correlation criterion as equation 1.…”
Section: X-ray Position Of the Point-source And Identification Of Thementioning
confidence: 99%