2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.humpath.2014.04.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High-mobility group AT-hook 2: an independent marker of poor prognosis in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Then 16 papers were excluded because of no available data or non English papers. Eventually, 23 articles were enrolled ( Motoyama et al, 2008 ; Wang et al, 2011 ; Yang et al, 2011 ; Wu et al, 2012 ; Rizzi et al, 2013 ; Yamazaki et al, 2013 ; Califano et al, 2014 ; Kong et al, 2014 ; Lee et al, 2014 , 2015 ; Jun et al, 2015 ; Kim et al, 2015 ; Liu et al, 2015 ; Xia et al, 2015b ; Na et al, 2016 ; Wei et al, 2016 ; Wu J. et al, 2016 ; Zhang et al, 2016 ; Zhao et al, 2016 ; Fang et al, 2017 ; Gunther et al, 2017 ; Mito et al, 2017 ; Strell et al, 2017 ). In total, 15 types of cancers were included in this meta-analysis including ampullary adenocarcinoma, breast cancer, colorectal cancer, clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC), esophageal adenocarcinoma, esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, gastric cancer, head and neck squamous cell carcinoma, hepatocellular carcinoma, intrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas, nasopharyngeal carcinoma, ovarian carcinoma, oral squamous cell carcinoma, pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, and tongue squamous cell carcinoma.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then 16 papers were excluded because of no available data or non English papers. Eventually, 23 articles were enrolled ( Motoyama et al, 2008 ; Wang et al, 2011 ; Yang et al, 2011 ; Wu et al, 2012 ; Rizzi et al, 2013 ; Yamazaki et al, 2013 ; Califano et al, 2014 ; Kong et al, 2014 ; Lee et al, 2014 , 2015 ; Jun et al, 2015 ; Kim et al, 2015 ; Liu et al, 2015 ; Xia et al, 2015b ; Na et al, 2016 ; Wei et al, 2016 ; Wu J. et al, 2016 ; Zhang et al, 2016 ; Zhao et al, 2016 ; Fang et al, 2017 ; Gunther et al, 2017 ; Mito et al, 2017 ; Strell et al, 2017 ). In total, 15 types of cancers were included in this meta-analysis including ampullary adenocarcinoma, breast cancer, colorectal cancer, clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC), esophageal adenocarcinoma, esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, gastric cancer, head and neck squamous cell carcinoma, hepatocellular carcinoma, intrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas, nasopharyngeal carcinoma, ovarian carcinoma, oral squamous cell carcinoma, pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, and tongue squamous cell carcinoma.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…HMGA2 serves a key role in the process of embryogenesis, however, it becomes an oncoprotein when expressed in adult cells. HMGA2 is highly expressed in a various types of human cancer and serves as a prognostic marker (15,40,41,133,135,145,(159)(160)(161)(162)(163)(164)(165)(166)(167)(168)(169)(170)(171)(172)(173)(174)(175)(176)(177) (Table I). Almost a decade ago, Fusco and Fedele reviewed the functions of HMGA proteins, including HMGA1 and HMGA2, in human neoplastic diseases, and suggested that the detection of HMGA be introduced as a routine procedure in clinical tumour analysis (7).…”
Section: Considerations and Perspectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…HMGA2 can regulate the expression of both oncogenes and tumor suppressors [9]. HMGA2 is important during embryonic morphogenesis [10] and is aberrantly expressed in cancer [7, 10-32]. High levels of HMGA2 in cancer are associated with increased invasiveness, stemness and poor prognosis [12, 14, 18, 22, 24-36] However, the functional importance of HMGA2 in regulating stemness and tumorigenicity in GBM are poorly understood.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%