2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcp.2015.02.052
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High order cell-centered Lagrangian-type finite volume schemes with time-accurate local time stepping on unstructured triangular meshes

Abstract: We present a novel cell-centered direct Arbitrary-Lagrangian-Eulerian (ALE) finite volume scheme on unstructured triangular meshes that is high order accurate in space and time and that also allows for time-accurate local time stepping (LTS). It extends our previous investigations on high order Lagrangian finite volume schemes with LTS carried out in [36] in one space dimension. The new scheme uses the following basic ingredients: a high order WENO reconstruction in space on unstructured meshes, an element-loc… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 111 publications
(215 reference statements)
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To improve the computational efficiency of our algorithm, we use the MOOD paradigm . In the popular WENO technique has been used for the reconstruction procedure, that in the polynomial formulation presented in implies the use of seven (in 2D) or nine (in 3D) reconstruction stencils, each of them producing a reconstruction polynomial of the form () that has to be blended nonlinearly to obtain the final reconstruction polynomial boldwhn for each element Tin. On the contrary, the MOOD approach only needs one reconstruction stencil scriptSi to derive one final reconstruction polynomial boldwhn, which is used as is, that is, unlimited .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To improve the computational efficiency of our algorithm, we use the MOOD paradigm . In the popular WENO technique has been used for the reconstruction procedure, that in the polynomial formulation presented in implies the use of seven (in 2D) or nine (in 3D) reconstruction stencils, each of them producing a reconstruction polynomial of the form () that has to be blended nonlinearly to obtain the final reconstruction polynomial boldwhn for each element Tin. On the contrary, the MOOD approach only needs one reconstruction stencil scriptSi to derive one final reconstruction polynomial boldwhn, which is used as is, that is, unlimited .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…with Δt V,i denoting the unknown timestep which satisfies the volume criterion (19). By using expression (20) to explicitly derive a formula for the new cell volume |T n+1 i |, the volume restriction (19) constitutes a second or third order algebraic equation for the unknown Δt V,i , in two and three space dimensions, respectively.…”
Section: Timestep Constraintmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By using expression (20) to explicitly derive a formula for the new cell volume |T n+1 i |, the volume restriction (19) constitutes a second or third order algebraic equation for the unknown Δt V,i , in two and three space dimensions, respectively. The final timestep will be given by taking as always the minimum between all Δt V,i , i.e.…”
Section: Timestep Constraintmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A first attempt in improving the efficiency of the flux computation has been presented in [8], where the use of a genuinely multi-dimensional HLL-type Riemann solver [1,2,30] yields larger time steps and therefore leads to a computationally more efficient scheme compared to a method based on classical one-dimensional Riemann solvers. Another possibility is given by the adoption of a local time stepping scheme [12,33], that allows each control volume to reach the final time of the simulation using its own optimal timestep, which obeys only a local CFL stability condition instead of a global one.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%