2015
DOI: 10.1007/s10109-014-0207-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High-order Taylor series expansion methods for error propagation in geographic information systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2, with a threshold value for identification of the steady-state, I ee , both normalized (Mejia et al, 2010). information systems (Xue et al, 2015) and spatial explorations (Sun e Zhang, 2016).…”
Section: Denoising and Steady-state Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…2, with a threshold value for identification of the steady-state, I ee , both normalized (Mejia et al, 2010). information systems (Xue et al, 2015) and spatial explorations (Sun e Zhang, 2016).…”
Section: Denoising and Steady-state Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it requires a high computational cost, and every modification in the model and/or in the input values requires a new execution of the method, being prohibitive in iterative processes . Another disadvantage, according to Xue et al (2015), is that this method does not have an analytical relationship between the uncertainties of inputs and outputs. Additional information about the Monte Carlo method can be found in Kuo and Uppuluri (1983), Helton (1993), Helton and Davis (2003), and Yan et al 2015.…”
Section: Denoising and Steady-state Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Two common methods to determine the propagation of errors through GIS operations are the Taylor series method and the Monte Carlo method (Xue et al 2015). The former is analytical and establishes mathematical functions that portray the uncertainty propagation, while the latter is a numerical simulation method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%