1995
DOI: 10.1049/el:19950968
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High-performance, free-space ruled concave gratingdemultiplexer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2003
2003

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For high performance, custom mirror curvatures may need to be fabricated. The use of a concave diffraction grating [20] could lead to a simplified encoder and decoder geometry, as well as improved dispersion characteristics in the mask plane. Future analysis of the optical system will be performed to determine and minimize these effects.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For high performance, custom mirror curvatures may need to be fabricated. The use of a concave diffraction grating [20] could lead to a simplified encoder and decoder geometry, as well as improved dispersion characteristics in the mask plane. Future analysis of the optical system will be performed to determine and minimize these effects.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, a similar concave grating demultiplexer has been implemented to demultiplex 0.4-nm separated channels spaced around a central wavelength of approximately 1.5 m. 30 This demultiplexer successfully separated signals from a single-mode ͑f͞5͒ optical fiber to multiple single-mode output fibers and achieved a spot size of approximately 20 m, which is near the diffraction limit for an f͞5 system. In this demultiplexer, the output waveguides were separated by 42 m and the cross-talk isolation between adjacent channels was measured at greater than 25 dB.…”
Section: E Diffracted Spot Size and Cross-talk Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Losses will be incurred owing to imperfections in the grating, diffraction efficiency losses from the grating, and coupling losses that are due to scattering, waveguide coupling mismatches, and Fresnel losses. A similar grating demultiplexer 30 was observed to have losses ranging from Ϫ6 to Ϫ9 dB for 40 optical channels; so we will assume a loss within the free-space demultiplexer of Ϫ9 dB.…”
Section: B Optical Losses and Power Budgetmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many examples that use a conventional lens, GRIN rod lenses [44], and no lens have been reported as optical demultiplexers. Recently, the idea of free-space concave grating demultiplexers has been reported [45], [46]. These demultiplexers use a wavelength range of 16 nm (40 channels) and channel spacing of 0.4 nm.…”
Section: Implementation Of the Spanning Multichannel Network Using Wdmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Depending on the optical components used, the size of the multichannel links is bounded either by the fan-out of the diffraction grating demultiplexers if the MUX-DEMUX scheme is used, or by the power loss of the star couplers if the optical star couplers are used. For the diffraction grating components, a fan-out of up to 40 channels has been reported [45], [46]. Taking this value as an upper limit, a fairly large SMLH network can be realized.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%