High-precision evaluation of contributions to<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mi>g</mml:mi><mml:mo>−</mml:mo><mml:mn>2</mml:mn><mml:mn /></mml:math>of the electron in sixth order

LeVine, M. J.; Park, Hae Yong; Roskies, R.

doi:10.1103/physrevd.25.2205

Cited by 19 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 13 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…[ 1)-( 6) turn out to be in excellent agreement with the values shown in ref. [1] and [2] (see Table I).…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

The analytical value of the corner-ladder graphs contribution to the electron (g − 2) in QED

Laporta

1995

Physics Letters B

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The contributions to the (g-2) of the electron from the corner-ladder graphs in sixth-order (three-loop) QED perturbation theory are evaluated in closed analytical form. The results obtained are in excellent agreement with the most precise numerical evaluations already existing in the literature. Our results allows one to reduce the numerical uncertainty of the theoretical determination of the g-2 of the electron. §

show abstract

“…[ 1)-( 6) turn out to be in excellent agreement with the values shown in ref. [1] and [2] (see Table I).…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

The analytical value of the corner-ladder graphs contribution to the electron (g − 2) in QED

Laporta

1995

Physics Letters B

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In 1982, Levine [38] published a new calculation of the sixth-order coefficient with a value of +1.176, lower that the previous one.…”

Section: Landau Polementioning

confidence: 94%

Something is wrong in the state of QED

Consa¹

2021

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Quantum electrodynamics (QED) is considered the most accurate theory in the history of science. However, this precision is based on a single experimental value: the anomalous magnetic moment of the electron (g-factor). An examination of the history of QED reveals that this value was obtained in a very suspicious way. These suspicions include the case of Karplus & Kroll, who admitted to having lied in their presentation of the most relevant calculation in the history of QED. As we will demonstrate in this paper, the Karplus & Kroll affair was not an isolated case, but one in a long series of errors, suspicious coincidences, mathematical inconsistencies and renormalized infinities swept under the rug.

show abstract

“…Note that I 0 n operation does not uniquely give the factor fo[^4e] in (4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17). Any function having the same IR limit could be used.…”

Section: Fourth-order Terms With Mass Insertionmentioning

confidence: 98%

Theory of the Anomalous Magnetic Moment of the Electron – Numerical Approach

Kinoshita

1990

Advanced Series on Directions in High Energy Physics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

High-precision evaluation of contributions tog−2of the electron in sixth order

Cited by 19 publications

References 13 publications

The analytical value of the corner-ladder graphs contribution to the electron (g − 2) in QED

The analytical value of the corner-ladder graphs contribution to the electron (g − 2) in QED

Something is wrong in the state of QED

Theory of the Anomalous Magnetic Moment of the Electron – Numerical Approach

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About