2017
DOI: 10.1088/1361-6471/aa67ae
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High-precision mass measurements for the isobaric multiplet mass equation atA= 52

Abstract: Masses ofCo m have been experimentally determined for the first time and found to be more bound than predicted by extrapolations. The isobaric multiplet mass equation for the T = 2 quintet at A = 52 has been studied employing the new mass values. No significant breakdown (beyond the 3σ level) of the quadratic form of the IMME was observed (χ 2 /n = 2.4). The cubic coefficient was 6.0(32) keV (χ 2 /n = 1.1). The excitation energies for the isomer and the T = 2 isobaric analogue state in 52 Co have been determin… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
18
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
(313 reference statements)
4
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, in Table 2 we present predictions of mass excesses of 52 Co, 56 Cu, and 73 Rb, whose masses were in AME2012 [25] derived from systematics, and 44 V, whose ground-state mass measurement is uncertain. Recently, the mass excess of 52 Co was measured as −34361(8) [43] or −34331.6(66) keV [44]. These values are in excellent agreement with our prediction, even though the difference between them is still far beyond the estimated (much smaller) experimental uncertainties.…”
Section: Mass Excess (Kev)supporting
confidence: 89%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In particular, in Table 2 we present predictions of mass excesses of 52 Co, 56 Cu, and 73 Rb, whose masses were in AME2012 [25] derived from systematics, and 44 V, whose ground-state mass measurement is uncertain. Recently, the mass excess of 52 Co was measured as −34361(8) [43] or −34331.6(66) keV [44]. These values are in excellent agreement with our prediction, even though the difference between them is still far beyond the estimated (much smaller) experimental uncertainties.…”
Section: Mass Excess (Kev)supporting
confidence: 89%
“…The obtained values of t II 0 and t III 0 turn out to not agree with the NN ISB interactions (NN scattering lengths) in the 1 S 0 channel. We predicted mass excesses of 52 Co, 56 Cu, 73 Rb, and 44 V, and for 52 Co and 56 Cu we obtained excellent agreement with the recently measured values [37,43,44]. To better pin down the ISB effects, accurate mass measurements of the other two nuclei are very much called for.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The TOF-ICR technique has been applied with a 100 ms long quadrupolar radiofrequency (RF) excitation. A new massexcess value for 52 Co was measured: -34 331.6(6.6) keV [6]. The proton-capture Q values for 51 Fe(p,γ) 52 Co and 52 Co(p,γ) 53 Ni are 1418(11) keV and 2588(26) keV, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%