High-quality health systems in the Sustainable Development Goals era: time for a revolution

Abstract

The Lancet Global Health Commission and respecting all workers to deliver the best care possible. Fourth, governments and civil society should ignite demand for quality in the population to empower people to hold systems accountable and actively seek high-quality care. Additional targeted actions in areas such as health financing, management, district-level learning, and others can complement these efforts. What works in one setting might not work elsewhere, and improvement efforts should be adapted for local context and monitored. Funders should align their support with system-wide strategies rather than contribute to the proliferation of micro-level efforts. In this Commission, we assert that providing health services without guaranteeing a minimum level of quality is ineffective, wasteful, and unethical. Moving to a highquality health system-one that improves health and generates confidence and economic benefits-is primarily a political, not technical, decision. National governments need to invest in high-quality health systems for their own people and make such systems accountable to people through legislation, education about rights, regulation, transparency, and greater public participation. Countries will know that they are on the way towards a high-quality, accountable health system when health workers and policymakers choose to receive health care in their own public institutions. Components Quality impacts Better health Level and distribution of patient-reported outcomes: function, symptoms, pain, wellbeing, quality of life, and avoiding serious health-related suffering Confidence in system Satisfaction, recommendation, trust, and care uptake and retention Economic benefit Ability to work or attend school, economic growth, reduction in health system waste, and financial risk protection Processes of care Competent care and systems Evidence-based, effective care: systematic assessment, correct diagnosis, appropriate treatment, counselling, and referral; capable systems: safety, prevention and detection, continuity and integration, timely action, and population health management Positive user experience Respect: dignity, privacy, non-discrimination, autonomy, confidentiality, and clear communication; user focus: choice of provider, short wait times, patient voice and values, affordability, and ease of use Foundations Population Individuals, families, and communities as citizens, producers of better health outcomes, and system users: health needs, knowledge, health literacy, preferences, and cultural norms Governance Leadership: political commitment, change management; policies: regulations, standards, norms, and policies for the public and private sector, institutions for accountability, supportive behavioural architecture, and public health functions; financing: funding, fund pooling, insurance and purchasing, provider contracting and payment; learning and improvement: institutions for evaluation, measurement, and improvement, learning communities, and trustworthy data; intersectoral: roads, transport, wa...

Clinical performance among recent graduates in nine low‐ and middle‐income countries

“…When governments do seek to improve health worker performance, efforts focus on in‐service training for clinicians already in practice. Studies have found that such training has only a modest impact on quality and cannot by itself close the large quality deficits observed .…”

Midwifery is a vital solution—What is holding back global progress?

“…There is a long road ahead toward the equitable implementation of quality care, 30 meeting the health-related United Nations Sustainable Development Goals 31 and universal health coverage. Science shows us that the journey would be considerably shortened through the implementation of midwifery that meets the international standards set by the International Confederation of Midwives.…”

Improving the quality of care for people who had a stroke in a low‐/middle‐income country: A qualitative analysis of health‐care professionals’ perspectives

“…Delivery of high quality and evidence‐based health care is a major imperative worldwide. Although major strides have been made in most countries with regard to developing high‐quality health services towards better patient outcomes over the past two decades, major variations in health‐care delivery still exist and this is quite pervasive in most health‐care facilities in low‐/middle‐income countries (LMICs), where substandard care is provided to patients culminating in poor patient outcomes . For example, it is estimated that up to 8.4 million deaths are recorded annually in LMICs as a result of compromised quality of care .…”