2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2019.111715
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High-rate humic acid removal from cellulose and paper industry wastewater by combining electrocoagulation process with adsorption onto granular activated carbon

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
16
0
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
16
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…However, it is necessary to consider the higher Water Supply Vol 00 No 0, 13 cost associated with this configuration. A possible way to reduce the costs is by reducing the removal requirement or the feed concentration by combining electrocoagulation with other processes, such as adsorption (Barhoumi et al 2019;Khan et al 2019). In this case, the lower cost associated with SM or P configurations could be an essential factor in choosing the best operating conditions.…”
Section: Optimization Of the Cec Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it is necessary to consider the higher Water Supply Vol 00 No 0, 13 cost associated with this configuration. A possible way to reduce the costs is by reducing the removal requirement or the feed concentration by combining electrocoagulation with other processes, such as adsorption (Barhoumi et al 2019;Khan et al 2019). In this case, the lower cost associated with SM or P configurations could be an essential factor in choosing the best operating conditions.…”
Section: Optimization Of the Cec Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among these methods, adsorption is considered the most effective and economical method for the removal of HA from aqueous solutions (Doulia et al 2009). So far, several adsorbents such as fly ash (Wang & Zhu 2007), modified rice husk ash (Imyim & Prapalimrungsi 2010), bentonite and montmorillonite nanoparticles (Derakhshani & Naghizadeh 2018), chitosan-H 2 SO 4 beads (Ngah et al 2011), magnetic chitosan nanoparticles (Dong et al 2014), carbon nanotubes into zeolitic imidazolate framework (Li et al 2019), oxidized galena (Wang et al 2019), granular activated carbon (Barhoumi et al 2019), and hematite and silicates (Tohry et al 2021) have been successfully applied to remove humic substances but the adsorption performance is expected to be further improved by developing new adsorption materials.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to all these adverse effects, such wastewater must be treated before discharge to the receiving environment and the pollutant concentrations must be reduced below the limit values specified in the regulations [11].Removal of color from wastewater is crucial for human health and sustainable water quality. In the literature, it was seen that many physical, chemical, biological and advanced treatment methods such as adsorption, biosorption, chemical oxidation, photolysis, chemical coagulation, flotation, ion exchange, electrodialysis, ozonation, membrane filtration were used in color removal from wastewater [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21]. However, many of these methods require high investment and operating costs and also have various operational difficulties.…”
Section: Introcutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Electrocoagulation experimental setup[37] 5 ml samples were taken at2,4,6, 8, 10, 12,14,16,18,20,25,30,35,45,60 minutes in all current densities (48.5 A/m 2 , 97.18 A/m 2 , 194.36 A/m 2 , 291.5 A/m 2 , 388.7 A/m 2 ). After the samples were centrifuged, the measurement of all samples, including calibration, was performed at UV-Vis recording spectrophotometer at intervals of 0.5 nm between 200-800 nm.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%