2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2011.07.116
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High Relevance Keyword Extraction facility for Bayesian text classification on different domains of varying characteristic

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…CA research is an active and complex field with the key challenge of adequately understanding a user input to produce an appropriate response (O'Shea et al 2011). There are two main approaches to understanding user input:  Semantic-based CAs endeavour to understand the meaning of an utterance by analysing the constructs and meaning of natural language (Lee, Isa, Choo & Chue 2012) or by scoring the semantic similarity of phrases (Li, Bandar, McLean & O'Shea 2004).  Pattern matching CAs (Wallace 2009;Convagent Ltd 2005) use an algorithm to match key words and phrases within an utterance to a knowledge base of pattern-based stimulus-response pairs rather than endeavouring to understand the input.…”
Section: Conversational Agentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CA research is an active and complex field with the key challenge of adequately understanding a user input to produce an appropriate response (O'Shea et al 2011). There are two main approaches to understanding user input:  Semantic-based CAs endeavour to understand the meaning of an utterance by analysing the constructs and meaning of natural language (Lee, Isa, Choo & Chue 2012) or by scoring the semantic similarity of phrases (Li, Bandar, McLean & O'Shea 2004).  Pattern matching CAs (Wallace 2009;Convagent Ltd 2005) use an algorithm to match key words and phrases within an utterance to a knowledge base of pattern-based stimulus-response pairs rather than endeavouring to understand the input.…”
Section: Conversational Agentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It can merge two adjacent concepts and forms an upper layer (or thicker granularity) concept. In cloud model, the concept merger operations are described as follows [ 7 , 8 ].…”
Section: Cloud Virtual Pan-concept-tree and Concept Jumping Upmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, with the continued development and innovation of information technology and natural language processing (NLP) fields, it has laid a solid theory and practice basis for text classification. An increasing number of supervised classification approaches have been developed for various types of classification tasks, such as decision trees (DT) [ 2 , 3 ], neural networks (NN) [ 4 , 5 ], naive Bayes (NB) [ 6 – 8 ], support vector machines (SVM) [ 9 12 ], and k nearest neighbor( k NN) [ 13 15 ]. These classifiers have their own characteristics, but in the perspective of comprehensive performance, SVM, k NN, and NB methods are more excellent [ 16 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Desta forma, ela é apresentada no Capítulo 4 como base teórica.Na etapa de construção de atributos, o conjunto de dados devidamente categorizado é representado apropriadamente para o algoritmo de aprendizado. Duas representações bem conhecidas de dado textual são: Atributos simples (palavras-chave ou frases-chave) incluindo unigramas, bigramas e n-gramas(68,69,70,71,72); -Taxonomias ou ontologias de atributos(73,74,75,76,77,78,79,80); -Atributos de domínios específicos, como listas de palavras associadas a emoção ou a opinião(81,82,83); Essa questão de descobrir o valor numérico de um atributo, incluindo seu impacto na classificação de texto, é amplamente discutida na literatura. Os métodos existentes para isso podem ser agrupados em i) clássicos e ii) modernos.…”
unclassified