2006
DOI: 10.1002/neu.20318
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High‐resolution analysis of neuronal growth cone morphology by comparative atomic force and optical microscopy

Abstract: Neuronal growth cones are motile sensory structures at the tip of axons, transducing guidance information into directional movements towards target cells. The morphology and dynamics of neuronal growth cones have been well characterized with optical techniques; however, very little quantitative information is available on the three-dimensional structure and mechanical properties of distinct subregions. In the present study, we imaged the large Aplysia growth cones after chemical fixation with the atomic force … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
32
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
(84 reference statements)
5
32
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The growth cone is comprised of morphologically and functionally distinct regions referred to as the central (C) and peripheral (P) regions (31). The C region is enriched in vesicles and microtubules and is probably involved in membrane expansion for axonal growth.…”
Section: Rnai Analysis Reveals Relevance To Axon Length and Functionamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The growth cone is comprised of morphologically and functionally distinct regions referred to as the central (C) and peripheral (P) regions (31). The C region is enriched in vesicles and microtubules and is probably involved in membrane expansion for axonal growth.…”
Section: Rnai Analysis Reveals Relevance To Axon Length and Functionamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, the dendritic pathway biomarker, Arp2/3, was localized to the leading edge of protruding veils by both immunostaining and by expression of tagged Arp2/3 (both Myc and GFP). It is not clear why this staining pattern was not seen in the study of Strasser et al (Strasser et al, 2004), but one possibility is that their wide field imaging missed the edge localization because of the greatly differing optical thickness of the neuronal shaft versus the lamellipodium [see Grzywa et al (Grzywa et al, 2006) and comparison of TIRF and widefield imaging of growth cones in supplementary material Fig. S3A].…”
Section: Veil Protrusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cholesterol-rich domains, or rafts, are denoted by arrows, while variations in Young's modulus are color-coded. The scanning size is 2 μm (reproduced with the permission of C. Roduit) [75], neural growth cones [26], focal adhesions [22], and lamellipods [55,79].…”
Section: Eukaryotesmentioning
confidence: 99%