2020
DOI: 10.1038/s41597-019-0343-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High-resolution and bias-corrected CMIP5 projections for climate change impact assessments

Abstract: Projections of climate change are available at coarse scales (70-400 km). But agricultural and species models typically require finer scale climate data to model climate change impacts. Here, we present a global database of future climates developed by applying the delta method -a method for climate model bias correction. We performed a technical evaluation of the bias-correction method using a 'perfect sibling' framework and show that it reduces climate model bias by 50-70%. The data include monthly maximum a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
180
0
3

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 296 publications
(183 citation statements)
references
References 102 publications
0
180
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…All 19 bioclimatic variables were downloaded in the baseline period 1970-2000. The same variables projected to 2050, under the IPCC RCP 8.5 scenario, were gathered using CCAFS's downscaled delta method (Navarro-Racines et al, 2020). This projection averages 33 different global climatic models at a 1 km 2 resolution.…”
Section: Climate Sensitivity In the Espeletia Complexmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All 19 bioclimatic variables were downloaded in the baseline period 1970-2000. The same variables projected to 2050, under the IPCC RCP 8.5 scenario, were gathered using CCAFS's downscaled delta method (Navarro-Racines et al, 2020). This projection averages 33 different global climatic models at a 1 km 2 resolution.…”
Section: Climate Sensitivity In the Espeletia Complexmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We downloaded climate data from CRU TS v. 4.03 (0.5° × 0.5° grid; Harris et al., 2014, 2020). We calculated monthly climate variables at 1 km 2 resolution by interpolation of complex multivariate data from climate data (CRU TS v. 4.03) using thin‐plate smoothing splines for each period (1950s, 1980s and 2010s) following the downscaling method provided in CCAFS (The CGIAR Research Program on Climate Change, Agriculture and Food Security; Navarro‐Racines et al., 2020). We then derived the bioclimate variables from the monthly climate variables (1km 2 ) using ‘dismo’ package in R. We also calculated an annual heat‐moisture index (AHM) by Bio1 (annual mean temperature) and Bio12 (annual precipitation) using ‘raster’ package in R ( Formula : AHM = [Bio1*0.1 + 10]/[Bio12*0.001]) (Wang et al., 2012).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For many scientific applications, the representation of the temporal and spatial variability of temperature and precipitation is extremely important 14 . The gap between these spatial scales is often bridged by applying a delta change method 15,16 to current-time climate data that is available at high spatial resolution of ca. 1-20 km e.g.…”
Section: Background and Summarymentioning
confidence: 99%