1991
DOI: 10.1029/90ja02179
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High‐resolution backscatter power observations of 440‐MHz E region coherent echoes at Millstone Hill

Abstract: A 40-/•s pulse length has been used to provide 10-s temporal and 6-kin range resolution observations of E region coherent backscatter from the premidnight eastward electrojet region to the north of Millstone Hill. The sensitivity of the Millstone UHF system is such that coherent returns can be observed over a 80-dB dynamic range and at levels down to the incoherent scatter background. Our observations can be divided into two categories: strong events in which the backscattered amplitude nears saturation and we… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
(5 reference statements)
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…E region coherent scatter is aspect angle sensitive. Therefore, GPS phase slips might be due to a mechanism rooted in two-stream FarleyBuneman instabilities (Foster and Tetenbaum 1991). Using simultaneous measurements of backscatter signal characteristics from the Irkutsk incoherent scatter radar (Kurkin et al 1999) and existing models for such irregularities, Afraimovich et al (2001a) estimated the order of magnitude of the expected phase fluctuations of the GPS signal.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…E region coherent scatter is aspect angle sensitive. Therefore, GPS phase slips might be due to a mechanism rooted in two-stream FarleyBuneman instabilities (Foster and Tetenbaum 1991). Using simultaneous measurements of backscatter signal characteristics from the Irkutsk incoherent scatter radar (Kurkin et al 1999) and existing models for such irregularities, Afraimovich et al (2001a) estimated the order of magnitude of the expected phase fluctuations of the GPS signal.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In order to interpret the observed range returns correctly, we use a model which simulates the radar range‐intensity profile that would be observed from an assumed irregularity latitude and altitude layer structure, on the basis of radar pointing azimuth and elevation, the 46 m antenna beam pattern, and magnetic aspect angle sensitivity. Such a model has been described by Foster and Tetenbaum [1991] and has been used for several studies of coherent echoes [ Foster et al , 1992; Foster and Erickson , 2000]. In the current version of the model we integrate over the antenna beam pattern out to 10° from the main beam pointing direction and determine the contribution to the total power at a given range from every point at which the constant‐range surface intersects the irregularity layer.…”
Section: Modeling Of Coherent Echo Sensitivitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Millstone's high power (2–5 MW peak), narrow beam (1.2° full width at half maximum), and receiver sensitivity down to incoherent scatter levels (−170 dBW) give it a unique capability for wide dynamic range, high‐resolution E region backscatter measurements. Several previous studies using Millstone data have probed the relationship between E region backscatter cross section, phase velocity, and, more recently, electric field strength [ St.‐Maurice et al , 1989; Foster and Tetenbaum , 1991, 1992; Foster and Erickson , 2000].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effect is well known in the literature [e.g., Gershman et al, 1984] and has been detected more than once by the writers in HF radar sounding of the field-aligned irregularities stimulated by powerful HF signals . Also, typical examples of the effect are coherent echoes observed when sounding natural ionospheric irregularities in the E region with the use of fully steerable incoherent scatter radars for lines of sight perpendicular to geomagnetic field lines [Foster and Tetenbaum, 1991]. The aspect-sensitive scattering is by tens of decibels more efficient than the isotropic scattering.…”
Section: Aspect-sensitive Scattering Of the Radiation From Discrete Cmentioning
confidence: 99%