2000
DOI: 10.1006/icar.2000.6426
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High-Resolution Calculations of Asteroid Impacts into the Venusian Atmosphere

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Instead of a pancaking effect, which would appear when small objects penetrate the atmosphere, we observe the collateral flattening of the projectile. This behavior has already been described by Korycansky et al (2000), who shows that the mass loss of large bodies is due to mechanical ablation rather than thermal ablation. These authors show that hydrodynamic instabilities (Rayleigh-Taylor, Kelvin-Helmhotz) grow before compressional waves have time to cross the projectile.…”
Section: Outcomes Of Collisionssupporting
confidence: 66%
“…Instead of a pancaking effect, which would appear when small objects penetrate the atmosphere, we observe the collateral flattening of the projectile. This behavior has already been described by Korycansky et al (2000), who shows that the mass loss of large bodies is due to mechanical ablation rather than thermal ablation. These authors show that hydrodynamic instabilities (Rayleigh-Taylor, Kelvin-Helmhotz) grow before compressional waves have time to cross the projectile.…”
Section: Outcomes Of Collisionssupporting
confidence: 66%
“…These effects occur in two different regimes. In the first one (static regime, when the aerodynamic pressure loading builds up on a time-scale larger than the time required for a sound wave to travel through the body, see Svetsov et al 1995;Korykansky et al 2000), we use a model which combines the effects of lateral spreading (using the so called "pancake" model of Zahnle 1992) and the growth of Rayleigh-Taylor instabilities (Sharp 1984;Roulsten & Ahrens 1997;Korycansky et al 2000) at the front of the fluidized impactor to obtain a multi-staged fragmentation model. In the second (dynamical regime, when the pressure loading is dynamical), where no lateral spreading is observed (Svetsov et al 1995;Korycansky et al 2000) but where instead mass is removed at the front of the bolide, we use a simple model for mechanical ablation which is also based on the growth of RT instabilities.…”
Section: Mechanical Destructionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the mechanical disruption, we use the "pancake" model (Zahnle 1992), but couple it to a model for the growth of Rayleigh-Taylor instabilities that develop on the front side of the impactor that behaves approximately as a fluid at dynamic pressures that exceed significantly the impactor's tensile strength or self-gravity (e.g., Roulston & Ahrens 1997;Korycansky et al 2000) . The model was tested by comparing it to simulations of different impacts, namely of the Lost City meteorite (Revelle 1979), the Tunguska event (Chyba et al 1993), impacts of km sized impactors into Venus (Zahnle 1992), and most importantly, the SL9 collision with Jupiter (e.g., Zahnle & Mac Low 1994;Boslough et al 1994).…”
Section: Population Synthesis Models: Background and Implementationmentioning
confidence: 99%