2016
DOI: 10.21276/sjams.2016.4.7.29
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High Resolution Computed Tomography Evaluation of Temporal Bone Lesions

Abstract: Many imaging modalities are available for the evaluation of the temporal bone of which high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) plays a crucial role in demonstrating the detailed anatomy of the temporal bone and assessing the disease extent. Careful and thorough evaluation is needed for middle and inner ear lesions for the early diagnosis and treatment of the disease, to prevent complications and to determine the best surgical approach. The purpose of this study is primarily to understand the capability of H… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

4
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
4
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…HRCT accurately predicted 94% of cases of incus erosion. Incus is the most eroded ossicle in our study similar to reports by Amit Shankhwar et al 13 and Rohit Vallabhaneni et al 14 Sonika Kanotra et al 15 Datta et al 16 and Rai et al 17 observed slightly low sensitivity of 87% and 85%. HRCT accurately predicted in 43% of cases of malleus erosion which was found to be eroded intraoperatively as well.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…HRCT accurately predicted 94% of cases of incus erosion. Incus is the most eroded ossicle in our study similar to reports by Amit Shankhwar et al 13 and Rohit Vallabhaneni et al 14 Sonika Kanotra et al 15 Datta et al 16 and Rai et al 17 observed slightly low sensitivity of 87% and 85%. HRCT accurately predicted in 43% of cases of malleus erosion which was found to be eroded intraoperatively as well.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Sandeep Sreedhar et al 5 and Mehrdad Rocha et al 18 reported poor radiologic-surgical correlation in stapes erosion and stated that the small size of the bone may be the cause in poor detection by HRCT. Scutum erosion was accurately predicted in 91% of cases similar to Gaurano et al 19 and Chakenahalli P et al, Sandeep Sreedhar, et al 5 , Rocher et al 20 and Dr Amit Shankhwar et al 13 In contrast, Sunitha M et al 21 reported no correlation for scutum erosion. Suat Keskin et al 22 described that differences in imaging and intraoperative findings may be due to inappropriate angles of the coronal sections, partial volume effects of the soft tissues.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 52%
“…Similar findings was reported byBagul, (2016) 9 who observed that temporal bone pathologies were more common in male where the gender ratio male:female was 2:1 which closely resembles with the present study.Similarl male predominance was also observed by Jyothi&Shrikrishna (2016), Shankhwar et al (2016) and Viastarakos et al (2012). 12,10,13 In HRCT findings it was observed in this present series that majority (96.9%) patients had soft tissue lesion, followed by 29.2.8% opacified mastoid, 27.7% ossicular and scutum erosion, 4.6% Erosion of tympanic wall, 10.8% erosion of tegmen tympani, 4.6% erosion of vestibule and facial canal and 3.1% erosion of sigmoid sinus plate and 3.1% erosion of lateral semicircular canal. Findings were comparable to the study conducted byBagul (2016)9 which showed thecommon HRCT findings in the cholesteatoma was soft tissue lesion in 100% followed by ossicular and scutum erosion 95%, erosion of tympanic wall 90%, opacified mastoid 57%, erosion of sigmoid plate 42%, erosion of lateral semicircular canal wall and tegmentympanii 19% and erosion of vestibule and fascial canal 9.5%.Cholesteatoma may be associated with extratemporal and intracranial complications, and almost all the complications are usually secondary to bone destruction and infected cholesteatoma, observed by study of Mafee et al 1988).…”
supporting
confidence: 51%
“…14 Similar findings were observed in the studies of Shankhwar et al 2016;Sirigiri&Dwaraknath, 2011). 10,15 In this study it was observed that a total 2 cases were diagnosed as malignant lesion evaluated by CT diagnosis among them true positive 1 case, false positive 1 case, false negative not found and true negative 63 cases identified by histopathology. In this study it was observed that a total 52 cases were diagnosed as Inflammatory lesion identified by CT diagnosis among the true positive 50 cases, false positive 2 cases, false negative 3 and true negative 10 cases identified by histopathology.…”
mentioning
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation