2014
DOI: 10.1002/jsfa.6653
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High‐resolution mass spectrometry to evaluate the influence of cross‐breeding segregating populations on the phenolic profile of virgin olive oils

Abstract: A total of nine phenols (viz. quercetin, ligstroside aglycon (p-HPEA-EA), demethyl oleuropein aglycon, oleuropein aglycon (3,4-DHPEA-EA), hydroxypinoresinol, hydroxytyrosol and phenolic acids such as p-coumaric acid, ferulic acid and protocatechuic acid) contributed to explain the observed variability with 99% confidence (P<0.01).

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All these components are responsible of well-known healthy properties of VOO ( Pérez-Jiménez et al, 2007 ). High variability for most olive oil quality components has been reported in progenies from breeding programs ( Sánchez de Medina et al, 2014 , 2015 ; De la Rosa et al, 2016 ). However, compositional quality of VOOs from wild origin has been scarcely studied.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All these components are responsible of well-known healthy properties of VOO ( Pérez-Jiménez et al, 2007 ). High variability for most olive oil quality components has been reported in progenies from breeding programs ( Sánchez de Medina et al, 2014 , 2015 ; De la Rosa et al, 2016 ). However, compositional quality of VOOs from wild origin has been scarcely studied.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As can be seen, VOOs from crosses Sikitita × Arbosana vs Picual × Koroneiki and Picual × Koroneiki vs Arbequina × Arbosana show separation, whereas those from crosses Arbequina × Arbosana vs Sikitita × Arbosana appear overlapped, which confirms no discrimination between these two crosses according to genotype. This study can be compared with a previous one focused on the influence of the genotype on the phenolic composition of VOOs . In that case, the phenolic profile did not allow discriminating Arbequina × Arbosana and Sikitita × Arbosana samples either, but a certain separation trend was visualized.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…This study can be compared with a previous one focused on the influence of the genotype on the phenolic composition of VOOs. 20 In that case, the phenolic profile did not allow discriminating Arbequina × Arbosana and Sikitita × Arbosana samples either, but a certain separation trend was visualized.…”
Section: Discrimination Of Voos From Cross Breeding Segregating Populmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Examples in tomato (Overy et al 2005) and rice (Calingacion et al 2012, Heuberger et al 2010, Lou et al 2011 were successful in linking metabolites to genetic information to facilitate strategic breeding efforts. Metabolomic studies have also been used to explore the phenotypic diversity in melon (Allwood et al 2014, Bernillon et al 2013, apple (Cuthbertson et al 2012), pepper (Wahyuni et al 2013), and olives (Sánchez de Medina et al 2014), demonstrating the ability to separate varieties by their metabolite profiles and identify differentiating phytochemicals.…”
Section: Impact Of Agricultural Practices and Genetic Lines On Food Qmentioning
confidence: 99%