2006
DOI: 10.1534/genetics.105.054098
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High-Resolution Quantitative Trait Locus Mapping Reveals Sign Epistasis Controlling Ovariole Number Between Two Drosophila Species

Abstract: Identifying the genes underlying genetically complex traits is of fundamental importance for medicine, agriculture, and evolutionary biology. However, the level of resolution offered by traditional quantitative trait locus (QTL) mapping is usually coarse. We analyze here a trait closely related to fitness, ovariole number. Our initial interspecific mapping between Drosophila sechellia (8 ovarioles/ovary) and D. simulans (15 ovarioles/ovary) identified a major QTL on chromosome 3 and a minor QTL on chromosome 2… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
51
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
1
51
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Further study of the genetic architecture of ovariole number in Drosophila spp. has revealed genotype-by-environment interaction (Starmer et al 1998;Bergland et al 2008) and several loci of large effect that interact epistatically (Wayne et al 2001;Richard et al 2005;Orgogozo et al 2006).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further study of the genetic architecture of ovariole number in Drosophila spp. has revealed genotype-by-environment interaction (Starmer et al 1998;Bergland et al 2008) and several loci of large effect that interact epistatically (Wayne et al 2001;Richard et al 2005;Orgogozo et al 2006).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sign epistasis occurs when a single mutation has a beneficial fitness effect on one genetic background but a deleterious effect on another . There is rapidly accumulating empirical evidence to support the idea that the sign, as well as the magnitude, of a mutation's fitness effect can depend upon the genetic background (Lehming et al 1990;Orgogozo et al 2006;Weinreich et al 2006;Poelwijk et al 2007). To date, most of the evidence for sign epistasis comes from microbes, and it has been shown to be potentially important in shaping evolutionary trajectories that lead to the acquisition of drug resistance (Lehming et al 1990;Weinreich et al 2006;Poelwijk et al 2007).…”
Section: S Ewall Wright Argued In the 1930smentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To date, most of the evidence for sign epistasis comes from microbes, and it has been shown to be potentially important in shaping evolutionary trajectories that lead to the acquisition of drug resistance (Lehming et al 1990;Weinreich et al 2006;Poelwijk et al 2007). The application of quantitative trait loci methods has also demonstrated the importance of sign epistasis in eukaryotic systems (Orgogozo et al 2006) and technological advances will continue to further our understanding of the genetic control of fitness landscapes.…”
Section: S Ewall Wright Argued In the 1930smentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of these genetic studies, however, concentrated on one or a few traits. Moreover, these earlier trait-specific studies could not distinguish between genetic changes that were a consequence of host specialization vs. those that directly contributed to the host specialization per se (Bono et al 2008;Matzkin 2008; but see Sucena and Stern 2000;Jones 2004;Orgogozo et al 2006;McBride 2007;McGregor et al 2007). …”
mentioning
confidence: 96%