High reversible capacity of SnO2/graphene nanocomposite as an anode material for lithium-ion batteries

Lian, Peichao; Zhu, Xuefeng; Liang, Shuzhao; Li, Zhong; Yang, Weishen; Wang, Haihui

doi:10.1016/j.electacta.2011.01.126

Cited by 380 publications

(194 citation statements)

References 50 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

182

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Unfortunately, none of these enabled satisfactory long term stability (maximum 100 cycles), and most of them showed a high 1 st cycle irreversible capacity (see Table 2 ). At the same time, previously reported graphene-containing alloy (e.g., Sn, [ 144 ] SnO 2 [145][146][147][148][149] or Si [150][151][152][153] ), conversion (e.g., Fe 3 O 4 , [154][155][156][157] Co 3 O 4 [158][159][160][161] or CuO [162][163][164] ) and insertion (e.g., TiO 2 [165][166][167][168] or LTO [169][170][171] ) hybrids were further improved. Interestingly, some appealing approaches, such as the use of ternary hybrids (e.g., RGO/SnO 2 /Fe 3 O 4 [ 172 ] or RGO/CNT/ Sn [ 173 ] ), porous 3D (e.g., RGO/Fe 3 O 4 [ 174,175 ] ) and hollow architectures (e.g., RGO/Fe 3 O 4 [ 176 ] and RGO/TiO 2 [ 168 ] ), were introduced.…”

mentioning

confidence: 75%

“…In all these cases, however, only modest improvements (especially in terms of cycling stability) were observed with respect to the reports published few years before. Although several publications reported the active material mass loadings, [ 58,60,65,129,130,132,138,142,147,168,172,[177][178][179][180] as well as the tap density of the active material [ 57 ] and the density of the electrode, [ 63 ] no considerations about volumetric capacity were made. Some progression on composite anodes based on graphene and germanium (i.e., alloy material), MFe 2 O 4 (M = Co, Ni, Cu) and M x S y (M = Sn, Sb, In) were reported in 2012.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Critical Insight into the Relentless Progression Toward Graphene and Graphene‐Containing Materials for Lithium‐Ion Battery Anodes

et al. 2016

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

that its extraordinary properties would enable revolutionary new technologies, which gave birth to the "graphene era". [ 3,4 ] Relying on this scenario, in 2013, the European Union launched the ¤1 billion "Graphene Flagship" project aimed to investigate the properties of this new form of carbon for various applications (e.g., electronics, sensors and energy storage devices), with the ambitious goal of guiding graphene from laboratories to commercial applications within a decade. [ 5,6 ] In the same period, the Chinese Government set up a similar investment to mass-produce graphene as thin fi lms (e.g., for touchscreen electrodes) and platelets (e.g., for use in batteries). [ 6 ] In the following years, hundreds of patents, mainly focused on manufacturing and application in energy storage, were fi led and the worldwide production of graphene and graphene-containing materials rapidly increased. Although a few Chinese industries claimed to already use graphene-containing materials for smartphone production, no revolutionary practical application relying on graphene has been yet developed. [ 6 ] Specifi cally with respect to the battery fi eld, a close analysis of the scientifi c literature reveals a struggle to meet the ambitious initial targets. A potential loss of focus from the fi nal application caused by hype and ease of publication on such a novel matter, together with the delivery of very misleading information [ 7,8 ] and erroneous statements [ 7 ] concerning the use of graphene in batteries are emerging as possible reasons of the ineffective graphene-era outburst. In this progress report, we do not focus on production and classifi cation of graphene and graphene-containing materials, which were already well reported in the past years. [ 3,[9][10][11] In contrast, due to the lack of an exhaustive analysis of the progression of the use of such materials in lithium-ion battery (LIB) anodes, we report here a critical evaluation of the most prominent research papers published from 2008 until the end of 2015. As shown in Figure 1 , three different stages of the graphene research in LIB anodes can be distinguished: a fi rst stationary phase between 2008 and 2010 where the lithium-ion storage properties of different graphene and graphene-containing materials were preliminarily explored, a second exponential stage, spanning from 2010 to 2014, where graphene and graphene-containing anode materials were broadly developed and investigated, and fi nally, a third phase, (i.e., starting from 2015), where the research seems to have approached a plateau. After Used as a bare active material or component in hybrids, graphene has been the subject of numerous studies in recent years. Indeed, from the fi rst report that appeared in late July 2008, almost 1600 papers were published as of the end 2015 that investigated the properties of graphene as an anode material for lithium-ion batteries. Although an impressive amount of data has been collected, a real advance in the fi eld still seems to be missing. In this framework, atten...

show abstract

mentioning

confidence: 75%

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Critical Insight into the Relentless Progression Toward Graphene and Graphene‐Containing Materials for Lithium‐Ion Battery Anodes

et al. 2016

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Li + diffusion in graphene is heavily influenced by edge effects [149,150] where the relative strength of Li + interaction (adsorption and diffusion) varies according to the morphology of the edge [149]. Such edges, along with other structural defects, offer reversible Li + storage sites and are thus responsible for additional capacities [151,152]. Graphene nanoribbons (GNRs), a quasi-1D nanostructure offering similar electrical properties to that of SWCNTs, were studied as a potential Li-ion anode having been previously identified as a potential candidate based on its edge storing capabilities [149,153].…”

Section: Carbonmentioning

confidence: 99%

Evaluating the performance of nanostructured materials as lithium-ion battery electrodes

et al. 2013

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Access to the full text of the published version may require a subscription. Rights © Tsinghua University Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin ABSTRACTThe performance of the lithium-ion cell is heavily dependent on the ability of the host electrodes to accommodate and release Li + ions from the local structure. While the choice of electrode materials may define parameters such as cell potential and capacity, the process of intercalation may be physically limited by the rate of solid-state Li + diffusion. Increased diffusion rates in lithium-ion electrodes may be achieved through a reduction in the diffusion path, accomplished by a scaling of the respective electrode dimensions.In addition, some electrodes may undergo large volume changes associated with charging and discharging, the strain of which, may be better accommodated through nanostructuring. Failure of the host to accommodate such volume changes may lead to pulverisation of the local structure and a rapid loss of capacity. In this review article, we seek to highlight a number of significant gains in the development of nanostructured lithium-ion battery architectures (both anode and cathode), as drivers of potential next-generation electrochemical energy storage devices.

show abstract

“…Li-ion batteries, which are typically composed of a transitional metal oxide cathode and a graphite anode, [1][2][3] are unable to fulfill the increasing demand for advanced energy storage technologies with long life and high-energy density owing to the rapid development of various portable electronics and electric vehicles. 4,5 Lithium-sulfur (Li-S) batteries are considered to be the most promising candidate to meet such needs owing to their inherent merits such as their high theoretical energy density (five times higher than Li-ion batteries, that is, up to 2500 Wh kg − 1 ), low cost and environmental friendliness.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The dual actions of modified polybenzimidazole in taming the polysulfide shuttle for long-life lithium–sulfur batteries

Wang

Cai

et al. 2016

NPG Asia Mater

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The development of lithium-sulfur (Li-S) batteries is of practical significance to meet the rapidly escalating demand for advanced energy storage technologies with long life and high-energy density. However, the dissolution and shuttling of the intermediate polysulfides (PS) initiates the loss of active sulfur and the poisoning of the lithium anode, leading to unsatisfactory cyclability and consequently hinders the commercialization of Li-S batteries. Herein, we develop a facile strategy to tame the PS dissolution and the shuttling effect in the Li-S system by introducing a modified polybenzimidazole (mPBI) with multiple functions. As a binder, the excellent mechanical property of mPBI endows the sulfur electrode with strong integrity and, therefore, results in high sulfur loading (7.2 mg cm − 2 ), whereas the abundant chemical interaction between mPBI and PS affords efficient PS adsorption to inhibit sulfur loss and prolong battery life. As a functional agent for the separator, the mPBI builds a PS shield onto the separator to block PS's migration to further suppress the PS shuttling. The dual actions of mPBI confer an excellent performance of 750 mAh g − 1 (or 5.2 mAh cm − 2 ) after 500 cycles at C/5 on the Li-S battery with an ultralow capacity fading rate of 0.08% per cycle.

show abstract

High reversible capacity of SnO2/graphene nanocomposite as an anode material for lithium-ion batteries

Cited by 380 publications

References 50 publications

Critical Insight into the Relentless Progression Toward Graphene and Graphene‐Containing Materials for Lithium‐Ion Battery Anodes

Critical Insight into the Relentless Progression Toward Graphene and Graphene‐Containing Materials for Lithium‐Ion Battery Anodes

Evaluating the performance of nanostructured materials as lithium-ion battery electrodes

The dual actions of modified polybenzimidazole in taming the polysulfide shuttle for long-life lithium–sulfur batteries

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About