This paper reports on a study that examined teachers' perspectives on learner centredness in a distance learning context. Data collection relied on semi-structured interviews conducted with 42 Canadian high school teachers. Teachers' perspectives were analysed then categorised according to the four dimensions of a research validated framework of learner centred principles. The perspectives grouped into the cognitive and metacognitive dimension emphasised the goal oriented, student directed, personalised, and independent nature of distance learning. Those grouped into the dimension of motivational and affective factors emphasised course design driven, not by content, but by student interest, relevance, choice, and input. Perspectives in the dimension of developmental and social factors highlighted the role of discussion forums and chat for communication between students. In the dimension of individual differences, perspectives highlighted the asynchronous nature of distance learning that supports a flexible pace, respects individual needs, caters to different learning styles, allows diversity in assessment, one-on-one attention, support, and personalised attention. Bonk and Cunningham (1998) identified learner centredness as a theoretical perspective relevant to educational environments where electronic tools are used. They highlighted the value of the American Psychological Association's (APA) framework of Learner Centred Principles (LCPs) (APA, 1993; APA, 1997). A learner centred perspective relying on the LCPs can connect research evidence with practice (Lambert & McCombs, 1998) and help conceptualise a role for technology in education that derives from theoretical principles and validated teacher practices (McCombs, 2000). The LCPs present an approach to learner centred instructional design that focuses, not on tool use, but on learning (Carr-Chelman & Savoy, 2004). The principles can serve as a foundation for "systemic, educational decision making" (Lambert & McCombs, 1998, p. 8) and for educational reform as well as the redesign of schools (APA, 1997).
IntroductionCarr-Chelman and Savoy (2004) identified a strand of empirical studies related to the LCPs which relies on use of the Assessment of Learner Centred Principles (ALCP) surveys. The surveys are validated instruments (see McCombs, 2004;McCombs & Lauer, 1997) and include both student and teacher versions. They were developed as learning tools for teachers (Crick & McCombs, 2006) and have been used for assessment of teacher practices. Studies have been conducted in which the surveys are administered either to teachers, students, or both (e.g., Daniels, Kalkman & McCombs, 2001;McCombs, 2001b;McCombs & Quiat, 2000a, 2000bWeinberger & McCombs, 2001 Technology, 2009, 25(5) and Quiat's study investigated both teachers' and students' perspectives of learner centredness in the context of a school reform program. The authors relied on the ALCP surveys to identify teachers as "high implementers" and "low implementers" of the program. Findings revealed tha...